-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor From: David Rivera (cuurmudgeon@sbcglobal.net) Sun Jun 12 10:08:32 2005 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: David Rivera: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor" Previous message: Andrew Folley: "Re: MgSO4 Bottom Line" In reply to: Len2976@aol.com: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor" Next in thread: Barbara Parker: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor" BINGO! Len2976@aol.com wrote:Gave patient Morphine and Phenergan. She slept all night. This morning her UCs are mild, q 7-12 min, and no cervical change. I plan to send her home after breakfast. Lenora Next message: David Rivera: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor" Previous message: Andrew Folley: "Re: MgSO4 Bottom Line" In reply to: Len2976@aol.com: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor" Next in thread: Barbara Parker: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:40:17 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.