-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor From: Garry E. Siegel, M.D. (garrys@mindspring.com) Sun Jun 12 00:16:23 2005 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: claire: "Re: FP Residency & Obstetrics" Previous message: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor" In reply to: RModugno@aol.com: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor" Next in thread: David Rivera: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor" Reply: David Rivera: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor" Robert: How can you justify your actions? How could you defend things if the baby went into NICU and required invasive treatment due to prematurity? Garry >Put her out of your misery - pitocin/AROM > >Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG >Marietta, GA -- Garry E. Siegel, M.D. Private Practice Roswell, GA Next message: claire: "Re: FP Residency & Obstetrics" Previous message: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor" In reply to: RModugno@aol.com: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor" Next in thread: David Rivera: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor" Reply: David Rivera: "Re: 36+ weeksBHC vs early labor"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:40:17 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.