Re: Habemus Papam!

From: Richard Chudacoff, MD (rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com)
Thu Apr 21 09:30:40 2005


Clarification: 17, 18, 19...not 13, 14, 15

--
Richard Chudacoff, MD

-----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Dr Eberhard W Lisse Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 12:40 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Habemus Papam!

You got evidence for that?

el

In message <E1DOLq2-000OVH-64@redirect4.airmail.net>, "Richard Chudacoff, MD" w rites: > Just one point to clarify: Teenage pregnancies are usually pretty healthy > and easy. They might not fit with our present belief system, but I am amazed > how well they handle postpartum (other than the typical immature secondary > gain posturing) > > Richard Chudacoff, MD > > -----Original Message----- > From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of > aippg@aippg.com > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:34 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L > Subject: Re: Habemus Papam! > > I have a strong belief that if a organisation does not change with time, > does not become more progressive: the organisation is bound to stagnate or > wither away. > > I sincerely hoped that this time a woman could have been chosen but:( > > By the way can anyone make out of the "Olive " tag given to this papal? I > cannot find any meaning > > > There are some truths that cannot be changed no matter who the messenger > > is. It is always best to stay with one partner. It is always best to > > have verbal communication between sexual partners. The mosaic laws may > > be "outdated" but does that mean we do not need hygenic practices? Same > > with sexual health. Spread of HPV is not good. Teenage sex/pregnancy > > is not healthy. What we implement is a safety net for sinners. I think > > we need to stick together (sinners who would rather not be). In my > > lifetime, I have not heard of anyone being excommunicated for OCP use. > > But does that mean that the communication and consideration necessary in > > NFP is not a good thing? I know of one woman (1960's) who went to the > > priest before her sons' first communion whom "by the rules" had to > > confess before she could approach the alter with her son. She used > > ocp's because she nearly died in her last pregnancy. She was forgiven, > > even without a "contrite heart" for what she was doing and allowed to > > recieve communion with her sons. And for physicans and NP's who deal > > with Catholic's who have had abortions, I ask you to inquire about the > > "Racheal Project" in your local churches. > > About two years ago, there was an article in a Archdiocesan newspaper > > about Emergency Contraception this newspaper explained that since it's > > action was to prevent ovulation and the meeting of sperm and egg it was > > to be considered as (unnatural) oral contraceptive pills. Not as God > > planned it, but NOT an abortifacient. > > > > I think it was said best, that we have a multitude of sins to worry > > about within the Church; genocide, racial cleansing, poverty, apathy, > > intolerance etc. Some of the "American" issues are just petty peeves. > > > > At Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Gerald P. Rodríguez wrote: > >> > >>And just who are "all" of you? > >> > >>Gerald P. Rodríguez, M.D., FACOG > >>Santa Fe > >>

>> >>>----- Original Message ----- > >>From: "Dr Eberhard W Lisse" <el@lisse.NA> > >>To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 11:11 PM > >>Subject: Re: Habemus Papam! > >> > >>> Yes, we are all shocked and dismayed at theses old mens' choice. > >>> > >>> But then natural selection will take its cause in a few years so the > >>> church has a chance to get someone who can face the challanges. > >>> > >>> Hmm, is Alzheimers caused by abstinence? > >>> > >>> greetings, el > >>> > >>> In message <198.3d444b5f.2f96a4c8@aol.com>, DoctorJoe@aol.com writes: > >>> > >>>> In a message dated 4/19/05 12:12:43 PM, annam@uic.edu writes: > >>>> > >>>> > You got your Panzer Pope, Joe. > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> Amen! They say that God works in mysterious ways, but sometimes he > >>>> just WORKS! HOOah! > >>>> > >>>> LOL > >>>> > >>>> Joe P. >





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:39:23 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.