Re: Fibroids/endometriosis/adenomyosis

From: Richard Chudacoff, MD (rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com)
Fri Apr 8 14:17:20 2005


Endometriosis, adhesions and the risk of adjacent organ injury. Length of hospital stay. And besides, laparoscopic surgery is much easier on your neck and back (as a surgeon.)

--
Richard Chudacoff, MD

-----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of R. Daniel Braun Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 6:40 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Fibroids/endometriosis/adenomyosis

What is wrong with Vaginal Hysterectomy? Why do you feel the NEED to put a Laparoscope in the belly? VH has less morbidity than LAVH and is done with Same day surgery. Just because it is older doesn't make it less beneficial than something newer.

Dan

On Apr 7, 2005 11:52 AM, Richard Chudacoff, MD <rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com> wrote: > 1. Does she still have dysplasia? If not, then LSH is okay. > 2. Ablation is only 50-60 % successful, Mirena more. You asked or > non-surgical options, remember? > > Personally, if she has no evidence of dysplasia, then LSH, same day surgery, > minimal morbidity...why not? If there is still evidence of dysplasia, then > LAVH or LH. > > Richard Chudacoff, MD > > -----Original Message----- > From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Garry E. > Siegel, M.D. > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 10:25 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L > Subject: Re: Fibroids/endometriosis/adenomyosis > > Mirena after an ablation? > > LSH after a LEEP for dysplasia? If she comes to hyst, I would remove the > cervix. > > Garry > > At Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Richard Chudacoff, MD wrote: > > > >Mirena, although I favor LSH > > > >-- > >Richard Chudacoff, MD > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Garry E. > >Siegel, M.D. > >Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 8:39 PM > >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L > >Subject: Gyn: Fibroids/endometriosis/adenomyosis > > > >49 YO P2102 with: > > > >known fibroids--4 cm intramural/subserosal one seen at lapscope a few > >years ago, still seen on scan and felt on exam > > > >Stage 2 endometriosis from same lapscope, excised totally > > > >S/P endometrial ablation for menorrhagia, done concurrently with > >lapscope. No fibroids in the cavity > > > >Also germane is that she has had a LEEP subsequent to the above for CIN2 > >(clear margins) with adenomyosis. > > > >Lastly, in college, she had a traumatic DVT and never has been on the > >pill. > > > >She was seen in December with worsening menometrorrhagia and pelvic > >pain, and placed on Lupron. She has become amenorrheic, has no pain, > >and says her abdomen is smaller (clinically she is around 8 weeks size > >today, no real change). > > > >She is very troubled by hot flashes. > > > >Options I've kicked around: > > > >1. Increasing her Zoloft dose (already on 100 mg/day). > >2. Adding a progestin (which one? dose?). > >3. Add low dose combination estrogen/progestin therapy (remember the > >DVT); if this is considered, might thrombophilia testing be in order? > >4. Of course, LAVH-BSO, but for the sake of discussion, let's stick to > >non-surgical options for now. > > > >Garry > > > >-- > >Garry E. Siegel, M.D. > >Private Practice > >Roswell, GA > > > > -- > Garry E. Siegel, M.D. > Private Practice > Roswell, GA >

--
R. Daniel Braun
       Kinky for Governor




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sat Aug 2 04:45:23 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.