![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Illinois Enacts Legislation To Regulate Gestational Surrogacy, Clarify Parental RightsFrom: ainsron (ainsron@sbcglobal.net)Tue Jan 4 16:37:37 2005
I have taken care of quite a few gestational surrogates over the past five years and generally have no problem with the issue, except for the financial costs to you and I. Generally the surrogates I have taken care of are covered by their own insurance or Medi-Cal. As far as I am concerned that is fraudulent, as the covered pregnancy is not in fact that of the mother, but of the biological parents. If they can afford the costs of paying for the surrogate and reproductive options necessary to reach conception, they also should be financially responsible for the costs of the pregnancy - not society or the mother's medical insurance. Ronald E. Ainsworth -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of dean@thehuffpeople.net Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 9:53 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Illinois Enacts Legislation To Regulate Gestational Surrogacy, Clarify Parental Rights .. [Posted by Dean Huffman] Illinois Enacts Legislation To Regulate Gestational Surrogacy, Clarify Parental Rights http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=27458 Illinois on Saturday enacted legislation (HB 4962) to regulate gestational surrogacy, creating the "most liberal and comprehensive law of its kind" in the United States, the Chicago Tribune reports. A gestational surrogate is a woman who agrees to carry to term a fetus -- created in a test tube without any of the surrogate's genetic material -- for another woman or couple who cannot conceive, usually because of fertility problems. Although 20 states have regulations for surrogacy, many are "vague" about parental rights because of the moral and legal difficulties associated with the issue, according to the Tribune. The new law, known as the Gestational Surrogacy Act, clarifies that the intended parents in the arrangement - and not the woman who carries the fetus -- are considered the legal parents upon the infant's birth and are responsible for making medical decisions for the infant immediately. The legislation eliminates the need for the intended parents to seek parental rights through a court petition or adoption, both of which are common practices in other states, according to Chicago attorney Nidhi Desai, the Tribune reports. "The idea was to clarify who has responsibility for a child born through this process and prevent a kid from being bounced around in court proceedings," state Rep. Barbara Flynn Curie (D), who co-sponsored the legislation, said. However, the new law stipulates that the surrogate maintains bodily authority during the pregnancy and therefore retains the right to choose to terminate the pregnancy and cannot be forced to undergo medical procedures during the pregnancy, according to the Tribune. The Organization of Parents Through Surrogacy estimates that about 1,000 infants are born each year in the United States through surrogacy. Law Details The law -- which was passed unanimously in the state Legislature last year -- expands on 1999 legislation in several ways:
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:47:38 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.