Re: Appreciate your advice

From: Joanne Bulley, MD (islesannie@yahoo.com)
Tue Dec 28 06:09:04 2004


If it is simple hyperplasia - then it is not (yet) pre-malignant. Although with the rest of the history she is high risk for same.

If she wants a hyst - that would be definitive treatment. If she is insisting on a non-hyst intervention then hysteroscopic resection might be reasonable - getting tissue for evaluation. I would be concerned about an ablation with her already having hyperplasia. I would want it to be convereted to normal endometrium first -- and if she has been treated with depo-provera already and still had hyperplasia that is more worrisome.

Joanne

At Mon, 27 Dec 2004, ENDODOK@aol.com wrote: >
>58 yr.old G2 P2, one year hx. menometrorrhagia. Endo Bx. simple hyperplasia,
>no atypia. UTZ uterus 5.7x 6.8x 10.9.cm. Cavity widened to 24 cm .Oblong
>inhomogeneous density 11mmx36mm (polyp?fibroid?carcinoma?). Endometrial lining
>posterior to this density 4-8 mm. Small fibroid anteriorly 7 mm.
> Had been treated by NP at an HMO with E/P, then Depoprovera, no
>improvement. Hb.10/HCT 32. Pt diabetic (HbA1c 8.6 / hypertensive. Weight 240.) Also
>has SUI.
> Was advised she needed a hysterectomy because of a premalignant lesion
>of the endometrium.
>
>Am considering the least traumatic Rx, via endometrial resection/ablation
>and TVT for SUI.
>
>Your thoughts??
>
>J.Glenn Bradley MD

--
Joanne Bulley, MD
Keene, NH, USA

"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed."

President Dwight D. Eisenhower April 16, 1953





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Fri May 2 04:39:35 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.