Re: An interesting perspective of EBM

From: Rafael Haciski (haciski@earthlink.net)
Thu Dec 23 12:49:52 2004


While that sounds wonderful, the next logical step will be to look at what individuals earn and limit what we can make (which to an extent already happens). How much more intrusion are we willing to take? Be careful what you ask for.

--
Rafael C. Haciski MD FACOG
Bradenton  FL

On Dec 23, 2004, at 08:03, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote:

> > In a message dated 12/23/04 5:49:43 AM, rbraun@iupui.edu writes: > > << Another way to skim the cream off the top and screw the people who > really need :Insurance". >> > > It occurs to me that if the government is making noises about limiting > contingency fees for attorneys to a certain percent (low), then how > about a federal > law limiting the percentage of "off the top" returns for INSURANCE > COMPANIES - > so they only make a capped profit and the most of the premiums > actually go to > paying claims? > > Joe P. >





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:47:24 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.