Re: South Carolina Supreme Court Dismisses 'Wrongful Life' Lawsuit on Behalf of Boy With Hydrocephalus

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Wed Dec 22 11:55:43 2004


Thank God this case was not tried in the Peoples' Republic of Brooklyn.

art

At Wed, 22 Dec 2004, art fougner, md wrote: >
>..
>
>South Carolina Supreme Court Dismisses 'Wrongful Life' Lawsuit on Behalf of Boy
>With Hydrocephalus
>
>Access this story and related links online:
>
>http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=27363
>
>The South Carolina Supreme Court on Monday unanimously dismissed a "wrongful
>life" lawsuit filed by a woman who claimed she was denied the choice to abort
>her son because she was not told he had maximal hydrocephalus, the Columbia
>State reports.
>
>Jennie Willis, who filed the lawsuit on behalf of her now eight-year-old son,
>said she would have legally aborted the fetus had she known during her
>pregnancy of the condition, which is characterized by excess fluid in the head
>and the absence of cerebral hemispheres that control thinking, speaking and
>motor control, according to the State. In court papers, Willis said that Dr.
>Donald Wu, an OB/GYN, in 1995 failed to tell her about the condition before the
>state's 24 weeks gestation limit for legal abortion. Wu claimed in court papers
>that he alerted Willis to a potential problem with the pregnancy after a third
>ultrasound at 22 weeks gestation and ordered her to undergo tests by a
>specialist, which she did not do (Brundrett, Columbia State, 12/21). The court
>said although it recognized the "extremely severe nature" of the child's
>disability, it would not accept the wrongful life claim, the AP/Fox Carolina
>reports.
>
>"Even a jury collectively imbued with the wisdom of Solomon would be unable to
>weigh the fact of being born with a defective condition against the fact of not
>being born at all," Associate Justice E.C. Burnett wrote for the court, adding,
>"It is simply beyond the human experience." South Carolina, along with 27 other
>states, have either rejected or limited wrongful life claims, meaning children
>born with disabilities cannot sue doctors for failing to inform pregnant women
>about their conditions, the court said, according to the AP/Fox Carolina.
>Willis plans to pursue a separate suit claiming that Wu did not inform her of
>the condition, according to the AP/Fox Carolina. The Supreme Court did not rule
>on that issue on Monday (AP/Fox Carolina, 12/21).

--
art fougner, md
ich bin ein New Yorker




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:38:36 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.