|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: breechFrom: Terrence.Jones@kp.orgWed Dec 22 11:00:50 2004
This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 006248C288256F72_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Funny, how "pace" can describe rest for one, and "speed" for another. And congrats on yet again missing another point. "All the cajoling and legislating" - think you're confusing Humpty Dumpty (all the King's Horses), with the emperor's new clothes. Have You any substantive comments on Dr. Priver's critique? I made an effort to separate the issue of "breech" (maybe You might let that rest in peace?) from quality of data in multicenter studies when the complex mgmt schemas derived locally in individual units are subject to external pressure from adherence to protocol. tj evsono@pipeline.com (art fougner, md) Sent by: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net 12/22/2004 08:31 AM Please respond to ob-gyn-l To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> cc: Subject: Re: breech much ado about nothing ... all the cajoling and legislating won't be able to resuscitate the moribund. requiescat in pace. art
> I think the beef is with the "emperors tailors". Kotaska pointed --=_alternative 006248C288256F72_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Funny, how "pace" can describe rest for one, and "speed" for another. And congrats on yet again missing another point. "All the cajoling and legislating" - think you're confusing Humpty Dumpty (all the King's Horses), with the emperor's new clothes. Have You any substantive comments on Dr. Priver's critique? I made an effort to separate the issue of "breech" (maybe You might let <i>that</i> rest in peace?) from quality of data in multicenter studies when the complex mgmt schemas derived locally in individual units are subject to external pressure from adherence to protocol. tj </font> <br> <table width0%> <tr valign=top> <td> <td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>evsono@pipeline.com (art fougner, md)</b></font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net</font> <p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">12/22/2004 08:31 AM</font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to ob-gyn-l</font> <br> <td><font size=1 face="Arial"> </font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net></font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> cc: </font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> Subject: Re: breech</font></table> <br> <br><font size=2 face="Courier New">much ado about nothing ... all the cajoling and legislating won't be able<br> to resuscitate the moribund. requiescat in pace.<br> art<br> <br> > I think the beef is with the "emperors tailors". Kotaska pointed<br> >out some deficiencies in the "new clothes" production process. </font> <br><font size=2 face="Courier New">tj</font> <br>
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:02:23 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.