-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com From: Rafael Haciski (haciski@earthlink.net) Thu Dec 9 16:40:12 2004 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Anna Meenan, MD: "Re: Awake and alert for teleradiology" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: Awake and alert for teleradiology" In reply to: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com" Don't forget the other two parties to the crime - ... the greedy, irresponsible, and litiginous population who all want something for nothing ... and the irrational and uneducated juries who allow this perpetration of "in" justice. -- Rafael C. Haciski MD FACOG Bradenton FL On Dec 8, 2004, at 21:40, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: > > In a message dated 12/8/04 7:06:05 PM, rmodugno@aol.com writes: > > << New York and Connecticut state officials said they are investigating > whether improper behavior by insurance companies has been a factor in > the rapidly > rising cost of malpractice insurance for lawyers and doctors. >> > > I still insist the three problems with the "system" are, in no > particular > order: > > 1) insurance companies who try to make more money than they should, > often by > dubious methods; > > 2) sleazy attorneys who either try to push "frivolous" cases or try to > squeeze more out of a case than it's worth, or on the other side try > to hide, cheat > or lie to keep the (non-frivolous) case from going forward; > > 3) lying doctors (either "plaintiff whores" who'll say anything or > defense > asses who insist doctors are NEVER wrong, because . . . well, because > they're > DOCTORS!) who keep the truth from coming to light no matter what. > > And these are probably in the minority in each category, but they add > up! > > Joe P. > Next message: Anna Meenan, MD: "Re: Awake and alert for teleradiology" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: Awake and alert for teleradiology" In reply to: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:44:50 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.