Re: Cord Blood Gas and Placental Exams

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Mon Oct 11 10:38:11 2004


This discussion pre-supposes that the pathologists are quite experienced in examining placental pathology ... quite an assumtion IMHO.

art

At Sun, 10 Oct 2004, Garry E. Siegel, M.D. wrote: >
>Robert and I serve on the same Perinatal Services committe and I echo
>his comments 100%. I was opposed to be "told" when I had to set gasses,
>or send placentas, but. . .
>
>You can't fight city hall :).
>
>As Robert said, pick your battles, and someone else said they've never
>seen a defense hurt by this data.
>
>Garry
>
>At Sun, 10 Oct 2004, RModugno@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>In a message dated 10/9/2004 9:00:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>>zygote@icsi.net writes:
>>
>>On 9 Oct 2004 at 18:40, Dr. Ainsworth wrote:
>>
>>> The risk managers for our hospital chain is requesting that the
>>> perinatal committee adopt standards that require physicians/CNMs to
>>> order blood gases and placental exams on high risk patients: low
>>> APGAR, meconium, etc. My position as the Chairman is that we already
>>> have suggested circumstances for these to be ordered, however I object
>>> to the idea of making them mandatory. I would rather audit patient
>>> charts to see how many fall out that would have received the tests
>>> under the guidelines, but were missed and focus on outliers.
>>> Additionally, educate the medical staff regarding the benefits, i.e.
>>> medico-legal protection. I have no problem with guidelines and
>>> protocols that protect our patients, I do have a problem with
>>> micromanagement by corporate bean-counters. Does anyone have other
>>> thoughts?
>>
>>Our hospital will now require this on high-risk deliveries.The L&D nurse will
>>remind the MD/CNM and if they refuse an incident report or something similar
>>will be generated. This has been sanctioned by our OB/GYN Executive Committee
>>( Yes, we have one because the hospital has about 150 ob's on staff and will
>>top out at about 18,000 deliveries this year). As the hospital is usually a
>>co-defendant in a lawsuit they want to have it be as defensible as possible.
>>
>>My advice. We have to fight so many battles - let this one go, Ron! ;+)
>>
>>Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG
>>Marietta, GA
>>_www.novaobgyn.yourmd.com_ (http://www.novaobgyn.yourmd.com)
>
>--
>Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
>Private Practice
>Roswell, GA
>

--
art fougner, md
ich bin ein New Yorker




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:49:43 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.