-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: BPP vs.KC From: Braun, R. Daniel (rbraun@iupui.edu) Tue Sep 14 08:06:26 2004 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: art fougner, md: "Re: interesting item in American Medical News" Previous message: gin11153@aol.com: "interesting item in American Medical News" Maybe in reply to: Efrain Ramirez: "BPP vs.KC" Next in thread: RModugno@aol.com: "Re: BPP vs.KC" Do they teach residents to do anything besides CS nowadays? Yes, PRIMARY CARE with PGY1 rotations on FP, Geriatrics, IM, etc R. Daniel Braun, MD "If everyone likes you, you're doing something wrong." Kinky Friedman I believe a self-righteous liberal or conservative with a cause is more dangerous than a Hell's Angel with an attitude. Andy Rooney -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of David Priver, MD Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 10:43 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: BPP vs.KC Agree with Richard, but at my place we use the Cytotec intravag. Works well and avoids a lot of the GI side effects. Sorry to hear that your hospital doesn't have the fortitude to stand up to this sort of intimidation and come down on the side of good medical practice. Isn't it sad how much of good quality obstetrics has been disposed of in this fashion? Twins, breeches, forceps and just about anything which requires skill and judgment. Do they teach residents to do anything besides CS nowadays? David At Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Efrain Ramirez wrote: > >A law suit and the Searle letter..IMHO it was a mistake. > >>At Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Richard Chudacoff, MD wrote: >> >>A travesty! Why not? Too expensive? >> >>-- >>Richard Chudacoff, MD >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of >>Efrain Ramirez >>Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 12:33 PM >>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L >>Subject: Re: BPP vs.KC >> >>Agree with all of you -- unfortunately, we no longer have Cytotec at >>our institution! >> >>>At Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Richard Chudacoff, MD wrote: >>> >>>Deliver. Nothing good happens after 40 weeks gestation. Cytotec 100 >>>micrograms, po, at 3 AM. Rupture at 8 AM, epidural at 9 AM, possibly >>>pitocin augmentation at 10 AM, deliver at noon. >>> >>>-- >>>Richard Chudacoff, MD >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of >>>Efrain Ramirez >>>Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 12:56 AM >>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L >>>Subject: BPP vs.KC >>> >>>Beautiful Kick Count - spot NST - non reactive - rest of BPP ok(Good >>>breathing -etc) -- GI 40 weeks 1-2 cms-next step? >>> >>>-- >>>"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the >>>opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." >>> >>>Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962) >>> >>-- >>"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the >>opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." >> >>Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962) >> >-- >"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. >But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound >truth." > >Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962) > Next message: art fougner, md: "Re: interesting item in American Medical News" Previous message: gin11153@aol.com: "interesting item in American Medical News" Maybe in reply to: Efrain Ramirez: "BPP vs.KC" Next in thread: RModugno@aol.com: "Re: BPP vs.KC"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:46:38 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.