-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: BPP vs.KC From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com) Mon Sep 13 21:06:15 2004 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: gin11153@aol.com: "interesting item in American Medical News" Previous message: David Priver, MD: "Re: BPP vs.KC" In reply to: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: BPP vs.KC" Next in thread: ainsron: "Re: BPP vs.KC" devil's advocate ... why not simply extend the NST since every other parameter is ok? if after 90 mins the trace is still reactive ... then the likelihood of a sleep cycle is nil and you have a more urgent indication for delivery. oth, to echo the others' sentiments ... the best antepartum is a postpartum. art At Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Efrain Ramirez wrote: > >38 y/o infertilty case - fundal height 36.. BTW - we do have prostin >gel - used it - Ok... > >> At Mon, 13 Sep 2004, art fougner, md wrote: >> >>What was the indication for fetal testing? >> >>Just curious. >> >>art >> >>At Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Efrain Ramirez wrote: >>> >>>Beautiful Kick Count - spot NST - non reactive - rest of BPP ok(Good >>>breathing -etc) -- GI 40 weeks 1-2 cms-next step? >>> >>>-- >>>"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. >>>But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." >>> >>>Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962) >>> >>-- >>art fougner, md >>ich bin ein New Yorker >> >-- >"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. >But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." > >Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962) > -- art fougner, md ich bin ein New Yorker Next message: gin11153@aol.com: "interesting item in American Medical News" Previous message: David Priver, MD: "Re: BPP vs.KC" In reply to: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: BPP vs.KC" Next in thread: ainsron: "Re: BPP vs.KC"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Sat Aug 2 04:43:54 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.