Re: Pennsylvania State Superior Court Orders Sperm Donor To Pay Child Support for Twins Conceived Through IVF

From: ainsron (ainsron@sbcglobal.net)
Thu Jul 29 12:19:19 2004


So for the legal minds out there, was the problem that the parties had only a "oral" agreement, rather than a contract written by an attorney?

Ronald E. Ainsworth

-----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of RModugno@aol.com Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 8:50 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Pennsylvania State Superior Court Orders Sperm Donor To Pay Child Support for Twins Conceived Through IVF

In a message dated 7/29/2004 11:14:43 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "" <dean@thehuffpeople.net> writes:

>.
>
>In The Courts
>
>Pennsylvania State Superior Court Orders Sperm Donor To Pay Child Support
for >Twins Conceived Through IVF
>
>[Jul 27, 2004]
>
>A three-judge panel of the Pennsylvania State Superior Court on Thursday in
a >ruling that could have "wide implications" for sperm and egg donors ordered
a >sperm donor to pay child support to the mother of twin boys conceived
through >in vitro fertilization using his sperm, the AP/Philadelphia Inquirer
reports. >Joel McKiernan acted as a sperm donor for Ivonne Ferguson in 1993 under an
oral >agreement that McKiernan would have no responsibility for any child born as
a >result of the IVF procedure, according to the written opinion of Senior
Judge >Patrick Tamalia. Ferguson gave birth to twin boys in August 1994 and filed
for >child support from McKiernan approximately five years later. Ferguson said
that >McKiernan was a "willing partner" in the procedure, according to the
>AP/Inquirer. The three-judge panel said that the agreement between Ferguson
and >McKiernan that released him from any obligation to provide support was a
valid >contract "on its face" but was unenforceable because of "legal, equitable
and >moral principles," according to the AP/Inquirer. The state appellate court
>previously has ruled that parents cannot make arrangements that give up a
>child's right to support. "We agree with the trial court, although we find
>(Ferguson's) actions despicable and give (McKiernan) a sympathetic hue, it
is >the interest of the children we hold most dear," Tamalia wrote in the
ruling. >The ruling "should give pause" to sperm and egg donors who expect
anonymity, >according to Arthur Caplan, professor and medical ethicist at the
University of >Pennsylvania. "Anybody who is a sperm donor ought to understand that their
>identity could be made known to any child that's produced and they could be
>seen by the courts as the best place to go to make sure the child has
adequate >financial support," Caplan said. At least 19 states -- but not Pennsylvania

--
>have adopted a version of the Uniform Parentage Act, which ensures sperm
donors
>cannot be "forced to take on the responsibilities of active fatherhood,"
>according to the AP/Philadelphia Inquirer (Scolforo, AP/Philadelphia
Inquirer
>7/25).

So soon you won't be able to find a sperm donor or obstetrician in Pennsylvania!

Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG Marietta, GA http://www.novaobgyn.yourmd.com

>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:46:22 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.