Re: COX 2 inhibitors in pregnancy

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Wed Jul 28 13:31:16 2004


a cautionary anecdote ...

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2001 Jun;53(2):113-6. Related Articles, Links

[Neonatal chronic kidney failure associated with cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors administered during pregnancy]

[Article in Italian]

Peruzzi L, Gianoglio B, Porcellini G, Conti G, Amore A, Coppo R.

Nefrologia e Dialisi, Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita, Turin, Italy.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are used since years as tocolytic due to their capacity to inhibit cyclo-oxygenase (COX) expressed in uterus and fetal membranes, fundamental for labour initiation and maintenance. The use of nimesulide, a COX-2 selective NSAID, has been recently proposed due to its capacity to selectively inhibit the enzyme expressed in the myometrium and endometrium. A case of neonatal irreversible end stage renal failure after maternal assumption of nimesulide as tocolytic for 6 week is reported. Cesarean section at the 32nd week due to oligohydramnios gave birth to a baby girl of 2090 g, in good general conditions, without signs of respiratory distress and of visible abnormalities. From birth she displayed oligo-anuria which required dialytic substitutive therapy from the second day of life. At US scan both kidneys had normal diameters for gestational age slightly increased echogenicity and a reduced cortico-medullary differentiation. On the 20th day of life she had a surgical renal biopsy for the persistence of oligo-anuria, showing fetal glomeruli, without lymphocytic interstitial infiltrate, and normal tubuli without evidence of necrosis. She is now 16 months old and under automated peritoneal dialysis on a home dialysis program. The occurrence of chronic renal failure in strict relationship with maternal nimesulide assumption in this case is strongly suggestive for a pharmacological damage, either direct or mediated by renin angiotensin inhibition, and possibly modulated by genetic factors, likely to account for the different outcome of similarly treated patients. A cautious use of this drug as long term tocolytic should be recommended while waiting for ad hoc experimental and clinical evidences of safeness.

art

At Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Richard Chudacoff, MD wrote: >
>Darn
>
>--
>Richard Chudacoff, MD
>
>A countryman between two lawyers is like a fish between two cats.
>
> <http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/b/benjaminfr128081.html> Benjamin
>Franklin
>
>Heaven grant that the burden you carry may have as easy an exit as it had an
>entrance.
>
>[Prayer To A Pregnant Woman]
>
>- <http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/d/desiderius148996.html>
>Desiderius Erasmus
>
> _____
>
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Lynn D.
>Montgomery, M.D.
>Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 1:16 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: Re: COX 2 inhibitors in pregnancy
>
>Even though there were hopes that the COX 2 meds would not have the same
>effects of ductal closure, decreased amniotic fluid volume, possible fetal
>bowel and kidney issues as the earlier COX 1& 2 non-steroidals, it appears
>they have the same potential for fetal risk. As such, they can be used only
>for a limited time (72 hours period) between 24 and 32 weeks for indications
>such as preterm labor or degenerating fibroids.
>
>Lynn
>
>Lynn D. Montgomery, M.D.
>
>Maternal-Fetal Medicine, OB/GYN
>
>Rocky Mountain Women's Health
>
>2835 Fort Missoula Rd., Suite 303
>
>Missoula, Montana, 59804
>
>406-549-0978
>
>fax 406-549-0987
>
>e-mail: apgar10@montanadsl.net
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Richard
>Chudacoff, MD
>Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 4:40 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: COX 2 inhibitors in pregnancy
>
>Anyone have info on using Bextra or Celebrex in pregnancy for uterine
>irritability, probably caused by adenomyosis or serosal endometriosis?
>
>Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG
>
>Chudacoff Obstetrics & Gynecology, PA
>
>15200 Southwest Freeway, #270
>
>Sugar Land, TX 77478
>
>Tel: 281-277-3900
>
>Fax: 281-277-3901
>
>rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com
>
>Richard.Chudacoff@obgyn.net
>
>http://www.mdhub.com/281-277-3900
>
>http://www.chudacoffobgyn.yourmd.com
>
>*****HIPAA Confidentiality Notice*****
>
>The documents inside this electronic transmission contain confidential
>information belonging to the sender that is legally privileged. This
>information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named
>above. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from
>disclosing this information to any other party and is required to destroy
>the information after its stated need has been fulfilled, unless otherwise
>required by law.
>
>If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the
>contents of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you received this
>electronic transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately to
>arrange for return.
>

--
art fougner, md
ich bin ein New Yorker




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Fri May 2 04:38:36 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.