Re: OB: Court Rules on Stillborn Death Damages

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Sat Apr 3 15:48:39 2004


Joe

with an expected significant hike in NY's malpractice premiums coming in July, this is NOT going to help. we'll see how this plays out.

art

At Sat, 3 Apr 2004, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: >
>In a message dated 4/3/04 12:31:49, evsono@pipeline.com writes:
>
>> That earlier ruling created what Rosenblatt called a "logical gap" in
>> legal precedent.  Since 1985, mothers have not been able to get
>> compensation for emotional damages when they miscarried or their babies
>> were stillborn due to malpractice.  Yet, in cases where babies were
>> damaged in the womb due to malpractice and born alive, their mothers can
>> seek emotional damages.
>>
>They did this a while back in Louisiana. The logic is: If the baby is
>"damaged" and born alive, only to die in the first few minutes of life, why would the
>doctor be liable for any negligence then, if he's not liable for the baby w o
>died BEFORE the lady got to c-section? Of course, he's still liable for the
>malpractice, but the question was, can the woman get emotional damages. I d n't
>see any difference.
>
>Joe P.

--
art fougner, md
ich bin ein New Yorker




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:43:20 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.