Re: Tort reform for obstetricians fails in the Senate

From: Anna Meenan, MD (annam@uic.edu)
Tue Mar 2 14:58:52 2004


It's an election year, guys. Another chance to shift the balance in the Senate.

--
                           Anna Meenan, MD

At Tue, 2 Mar 2004, GIN11153@aol.com wrote: > >Listmates: > >The following article may be of interest to members on this list.  "Organ zed > >medicine viewed a tort reform measure in the U.S. Senate aimed at helping >obstetrician-gynecologists "a good first step," but the bill couldn't get a >foot >off the ground. >Despite the legislation's narrow focus, supporters didn't have the 60 votes >needed to block a Democratic filibuster. By a 48-45 vote on Feb. 24, Senato s > >rejected the idea of limiting debate on the measure, which called for cappi g > >pain and suffering awards in medical malpractice cases against ob-gyns to >$250,000." >http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2004/03/08/gvsb0308.htm > >Gail Neuman RNC CPHW LNC >listowner of LegalNurseConsulting@yahoogroups.com >certified high risk OB/legal nurse consultant >Tustin, CA





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sat Aug 2 04:43:08 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.