Re: Tort reform for obstetricians fails in the Senate

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Tue Mar 2 12:34:10 2004


Predictable - note that this vote was only to bring the matter to the floor ... God forbid.

art

At Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Richard Chudacoff, MD wrote: >
>Gee, I wonder how Edwards voted? Oh, he didn’t vote. Nor did Kerry. Kennedy
>voted against.
>
>Here are the votes
>
>--
>Grouped By Vote Position
>YEAs ---48
>Alexander (R-TN)
>Allard (R-CO)
>Allen (R-VA)
>Bond (R-MO)
>Brownback (R-KS)
>Bunning (R-KY)
>Burns (R-MT)
>Byrd (D-WV)
>Campbell (R-CO)
>Chafee (R-RI)
>Chambliss (R-GA)
>Cochran (R-MS)
>Coleman (R-MN)
>Collins (R-ME)
>Cornyn (R-TX)
>Craig (R-ID)
>DeWine (R-OH)
>Dole (R-NC)
>Domenici (R-NM)
>Ensign (R-NV)
>Enzi (R-WY)
>Fitzgerald (R-IL)
>Frist (R-TN)
>Grassley (R-IA)
>Gregg (R-NH)
>Hagel (R-NE)
>Hatch (R-UT)
>Hutchison (R-TX)
>Inhofe (R-OK)
>Kyl (R-AZ)
>Lott (R-MS)
>Lugar (R-IN)
>McCain (R-AZ)
>McConnell (R-KY)
>Murkowski (R-AK)
>Nickles (R-OK)
>Roberts (R-KS)
>Santorum (R-PA)
>Sessions (R-AL)
>Smith (R-OR)
>Snowe (R-ME)
>Specter (R-PA)
>Stevens (R-AK)
>Sununu (R-NH)
>Talent (R-MO)
>Thomas (R-WY)
>Voinovich (R-OH)
>Warner (R-VA)
>
>NAYs ---45
>Akaka (D-HI)
>Baucus (D-MT)
>Bayh (D-IN)
>Biden (D-DE)
>Bingaman (D-NM)
>Breaux (D-LA)
>Cantwell (D-WA)
>Carper (D-DE)
>Clinton (D-NY)
>Conrad (D-ND)
>Crapo (R-ID)
>Daschle (D-SD)
>Dayton (D-MN)
>Dodd (D-CT)
>Dorgan (D-ND)
>Durbin (D-IL)
>Feingold (D-WI)
>Feinstein (D-CA)
>Graham (D-FL)
>Graham (R-SC)
>Harkin (D-IA)
>Hollings (D-SC)
>Inouye (D-HI)
>Jeffords (I-VT)
>Kennedy (D-MA)
>Kohl (D-WI)
>Landrieu (D-LA)
>Lautenberg (D-NJ)
>Leahy (D-VT)
>Levin (D-MI)
>Lieberman (D-CT)
>Lincoln (D-AR)
>Mikulski (D-MD)
>Murray (D-WA)
>Nelson (D-FL)
>Nelson (D-NE)
>Pryor (D-AR)
>Reed (D-RI)
>Reid (D-NV)
>Rockefeller (D-WV)
>Sarbanes (D-MD)
>Schumer (D-NY)
>Shelby (R-AL)
>Stabenow (D-MI)
>Wyden (D-OR)
>
>Not Voting - 7
>Bennett (R-UT)
>Boxer (D-CA)
>Corzine (D-NJ)
>Edwards (D-NC)
>Johnson (D-SD)
>Kerry (D-MA)
>
>Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG
>
>*****HIPAA Confidentiality Notice*****
>
>The documents inside this electronic transmission contain confidential
>information belonging to the sender that is legally privileged. This
>information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named
>above. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from
>disclosing this information to any other party and is required to destroy
>the information after its stated need has been fulfilled, unless otherwise
>required by law.
>
>If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the
>contents of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you received this
>electronic transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately to
>arrange for return.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of
>GIN11153@aol.com
>Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 11:33 AM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: Tort reform for obstetricians fails in the Senate
>
>Listmates:
>
>The following article may be of interest to members on this list.
>"Organized
>medicine viewed a tort reform measure in the U.S. Senate aimed at helping
>obstetrician-gynecologists "a good first step," but the bill couldn't get a
>foot
>off the ground.
>Despite the legislation's narrow focus, supporters didn't have the 60 votes
>needed to block a Democratic filibuster. By a 48-45 vote on Feb. 24,
>Senators
>rejected the idea of limiting debate on the measure, which called for
>capping
>pain and suffering awards in medical malpractice cases against ob-gyns to
>$250,000."
>http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2004/03/08/gvsb0308.htm
>
>Gail Neuman RNC CPHW LNC
>listowner of LegalNurseConsulting@yahoogroups.com
>certified high risk OB/legal nurse consultant
>Tustin, CA
>

--
art fougner, md
ich bin ein New Yorker




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:48:45 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.