Re: cervical length in twins

From: Anna Meenan, MD (annam@uic.edu)
Thu Jan 29 21:32:32 2004


This article concerns "women with twin pregnancies presenting with threatened premature labor", which would not include Charlie's asymptomatic patient.

--
                       Anna Meenan, MD

At Thu, 29 Jan 2004, art fougner, md wrote: > >This timely article appears in the latest issue of Ultrasound in >Obstetrics and Gynecology - > >Sonographic measurement of cervical length in twin pregnancies in >threatened preterm labor >I. Fuchs 1, E. Tsoi 1, W. Henrich 1, J. W. Dudenhausen 1, K. H. >Nicolaides 2 * >1Virchow Clinic Charité, Berlin, Germany >2Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College >Hospital, London, UK > >email: K. H. Nicolaides (fmf@fetalmedicine.com) > >*Correspondence to K. H. Nicolaides, Harris Birthright Research Centre >for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital Medical School, Denmark >Hill, London SE5 8RX, UK > >Funded by: > The Fetal Medicine Foundation > >Keywords >cervical length • preterm labor • twin pregnancy • ultrasound > >Abstract > >Objective >To determine whether sonographic measurement of cervical length in twin >pregnancies presenting with threatened preterm labor helps distinguish >between true and false labor. > >Methods >In 87 women with twin pregnancies presenting with regular and painful >uterine contractions at 24-36 (median, 30) weeks of gestation, cervical >length was measured by transvaginal ultrasound. Women presenting in >active labor, defined by the presence of cervical dilation of 3 cm or >more, with ruptured membranes and those who underwent a prior or >subsequent cervical cerclage, were excluded from the study. The >clinical management was determined by the attending obstetrician without >taking into account the cervical length. Primary outcome of the study >was delivery within 7 days of presentation. > >Results >Delivery within 7 days of presentation occurred in 19/87 (22%) >pregnancies and this was inversely related to cervical length, >decreasing from 80% (4/5) at 1-5 mm, to 46% (6/13) at 6-10 mm, 29% >(4/14) at 11-15 mm, 21% (4/19) at 16-20 mm, 7% (1/15) at 21-25 mm and 0% >(0/21) at >25 mm. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that >significant independent contribution in the prediction of delivery >within 7 days was provided by cervical length (odds ratio (OR) = 0.78, >95% CI 0.68-0.89, P < 0.001) and use of tocolytics (OR = 0.13, 95% CI >0.02-0.76, P = 0.024), with no significant contribution from gestation >at presentation, chorionicity, ethnic origin, maternal age, body mass >index, parity, previous history of preterm delivery, cigarette smoking, >contraction frequency, vaginal bleeding or the administration of >antibiotics or steroids. > >Conclusion >In women with twin pregnancies presenting with threatened preterm labor, >sonographic measurement of cervical length helps distinguish between >those who deliver within 7 days and those who do not. Copyright © 2004 >ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. > >art > >At Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Charlie Chambers wrote: >> >>Curious how others would manage this patient. 24 year old with twin >>gestation at 28 weeks otherwise no risk factors including no preterm >>deliveries. To date, pregnancy has been uneventful and diamniotic twins >>remain concordant with good growth. Comes in for routine clinic visit. >>She has absolutely no complaints. >> >>Question 1. >>Would you do cervical length measurement routinely? >> >>Question 2. >>If done, and measurement is 1-1.5 cm, and patient still denies >>contractions, what would you do? >> >>Question 3. >>You are in a small hospital that handles 36 weeks and greater, would >>you transfer care immediately if upon digital exam, she is found to be >>1 cm dilated? >> >>We were debating this topic and came up with a few hypotheticals. >>Wanted to see what others would do. >> >>************************************************************************ >>****** >>************************************************************************

>> >>-- >>************************************************************************ >>Charlie Chambers >>************************************************************************

>>Hood River, OR USA >>cchamber@alumni.rice.edu >> >>&quot;All good things...come by grace, >>and grace comes by art, >>and art does not come easy.&quot; >> >>Norman Maclean >>************************************************************************ >>******* >>************************************************************************

>>************************************************************************ >> >-- >art fougner, md >ich bin ein New Yorker >





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:54:36 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.