|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: (Fwd) Re: Hospital faces suit over a pregnancyFrom: R. Daniel Braun, MD (rbraun@iupui.edu)Wed Jan 21 23:04:17 2004
At Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Robert J. Carpenter, Jr. MD wrote: > >sending again >------- Forwarded message follows ------- >From: Robert J. Carpenter, Jr. MD <zygote@icsi.net> >To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net >Subject: Re: Hospital faces suit over a pregnancy >Date sent: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:54:30 -0600 > >Given the almost absolute immunity of the judge in this matter and >the >fact that the hospital sought a court order for obstensively >appropriate reasons, it will be very difficult for them the maintain >the suit, if it is ever filed. However, given the current state of >malpractice in Pa. perhaps even this frivolous suit will be allowed. > >The whole reason that a court order is obtained is to protect the >institution and its physicians in such a case where the order is >sought for protection of the child. > >I have sought and obtained 3 mandated court orders for C/S . >However, >they were highly spercific without probability of vaginal delivery, >like the 8.5# fetus in an android pelvis with PROM and double >footling >breech, Transverse lie with arm presenting etc. > >I know no facts except those stated. The need to obtain a court >order >must be based on impeccable data. Such cases as the Georgia >case of >the placenta previa with mandated C/S which then ended up with a >vag >delivery and no previa and the forced C/S of the 26-27wk fetus in >the >DC mother with terminal cancer are examples of ones which were >not >well documented. > >If others have comments, will be pleased to read them! Bob > >On 19 Jan 2004 at 15:47, rmodugno@aol.com wrote: > >> This Story has been sent to you by : rmodugno@aol.com >> >> Hospital faces suit over a pregnancyWILKES-BARRE - The husband of a >> woman who refused to deliver her baby by Caesarean section plans to >> challenge a court order that gave a hospital permission to assume >> guardianship over her fetus. The full article will be available on >> the Web for a limited time: >> http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/local/states/pennsylvania/ci >> ti es_neighborhoods/philadelphia/7744407.htm (c) 2004 Philadelphia >> Inquirer and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved. >> >------- End of forwarded message -------Robert J. Carpenter, Jr. MD >6624 Fannin, #2720 >St. Luke's Medical Tower >Houston,TX 77030-2339 >713-795-4600
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:36:35 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.