Re: ? Familial serouscystadenomata

From: Abdul Raman Lilla (arlilla@hotmail.com)
Sun Jan 18 23:36:11 2004


I am looking after a family of three teenage daughters, all of whom had large unilaterral serouscyst adenomata, which needed cystectomy. Is it possible that it is familial, if so can it recur, is there any advice i should give to the patients.

Thank you all.

>From: Betsy Hyde <elishyde@mindspring.com>
>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>Subject: Re: Demise delivery Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:50:56 -0600
>
>On Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 11:31 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>
>>Betsy,
>>
>>If she doesn't want to remain pregnant, advise her what a ruptured
>>uterus will mean to ther.
>
>actually, she had a ruptured uterus and it was totally asymptomatic. It
>was an incidental finding at repeat c/s after failed induction which was
>called because of concerns (mine) re this very issue.
>>
>>With regards to the catheter, read his post properly :-)-O. He said
>>apply traction. He didn't write use Oxytocin :-)-O. I like the catheter
>>too, and instill Prostglandin extramniotically with very good effects,
>>but in this case of course not.
>>
>
>I didn't read this post,El. I am just reporting what our md/cnm group did.
> The management was by the physicians. I was the midwife caring for this
>woman, and felt that after non-progressive labor with foley and pit that it
>was time to proceed to rpt c/s. That is when the rupture was discovered.
>
>Betsy Hyde CNM
>Branford, CT
>

>From rmodugno@aol.com Mon Jan 19 15:46:04 2004
Received: from smtp.services.ny1.ip-soft.net (fw1att1.ip-soft.net [12.130.86.68]) by dns.obgyn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/dsb-1.1) with ESMTP id i0JLjxg26611 for <ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:46:02 -0600 Received: from prodapp06.krd.ip-soft.net (prodapp06 [192.168.82.106]) by smtp.services.ny1.ip-soft.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0JLjvEI030788 for <ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:45:57 GMT Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:45:57 GMT Message-ID: <1283640.1074548757055.JavaMail.postmaster@knightridder.com> From: rmodugno@aol.com To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Subject: Hospital faces suit over a pregnancy Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This Story has been sent to you by : rmodugno@aol.com<pre> Hospital faces suit over a pregnancyWILKES-BARRE - The husband of a woman who refused to deliver her baby by Caesarean section plans to challenge a court order that gave a hospital permission to assume guardianship over her fetus. The full article will be available on the Web for a limited time: <a href="http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/local/states/pennsylvania/cities_neighborhoods/philadelphia/7744407.htm">http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/local/states/pennsylvania/cities_neighborhoods/philadelphia/7744407.htm</a> (c) 2004 Philadelphia Inquirer and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved.

</pre><br> <p>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:54:36 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.