Re: Mirena & Nullips

From: Garry E. Siegel, M.D. (garrys@mindspring.com)
Sun Nov 23 12:10:41 2003


Bernard:

All we have is: 1. Mirena 2. Progestasert--one year product here 3. Paragard-T--10 year product

What is the rationale behind a coil in a nulligravida, versus a hormone containing product, if any?

Garry

At Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Bernard Cristalli wrote: >
>I actually put coils in nullips, specially if non disciplinate. I never did
>with a Mirena.
>
>--
>Bernard Cristalli MD AMACOG
>AIHP - ACCA
>Paris France
>http://www.CliniquedelEssonne.fr
>http://www.obgyn.net/corresp/cristalli.htm
>http://www.gyneweb.fr
>'64 Mk2 3.8
>
>> De : garrys@mindspring.com (Garry E. Siegel, M.D.)
>>
>> Pretty much ditto for me. However, I am under the impression that US
>> gyns are much more conservative in placement in nulligravidas than other
>> gyns in the world. Comments? (Bernard?).
>>
>> Garry
>

--
Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
Private Practice
Roswell, GA




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:00:00 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.