![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: OB: Bladder Flap flapFrom: Terrence.Jones@kp.orgFri Jul 18 12:32:40 2003
This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 005D56A088256D67_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes. 2 = "time, and time again" 3 = "series" tj DoctorJoe@aol.com Sent by: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net 07/17/2003 06:37 PM Please respond to ob-gyn-l To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> cc: Subject: Re: OB: Bladder Flap flap In a message dated 7/17/03 20:15:29, Terrence.Jones@kp.org writes: Lastly, from the 'intuitive' sense this approach provides plausibility. Is there any formal description of this in the (as Mats describes) litterature? Venturing into "NEO"-realism need not be done so blindly. After all, we must "see" to know - which is the red pill. And 'abierto los ojos' is but the first step in the process of tidying up the 'symbolic order'. No formal description. Only my series of about 3. Nothing more than "Oh, shit! We can't get the head up!" <sweat profusely, breathe hard> "What do we do now???" Dr. Joe: "Uh..... look up here .... <squirm> THERE YOU GO, Kiddie! <a little effort> Here we are! Sheesh!" That's the formal description of the technique. Maybe I should publish it... The Green Journal takes anything 3 or more as a series, doesn't it? Joe P. --=_alternative 005D56A088256D67_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Yes. 2 = "time, and time again"</font> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> 3 = "series" tj</font> <br> <table width0%> <tr valign=top> <td> <td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>DoctorJoe@aol.com</b></font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net</font> <p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">07/17/2003 06:37 PM</font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to ob-gyn-l</font> <br> <td><font size=1 face="Arial"> </font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net></font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> cc: </font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> Subject: Re: OB: Bladder Flap flap</font></table> <br> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><br> In a message dated 7/17/03 20:15:29, Terrence.Jones@kp.org writes:<br> <br> </font> <br><font size=2 face="Times New Roman"><br> Lastly, from the 'intuitive' sense this approach provides plausibility. Is there any formal description of this in the (as Mats describes) litterature?<br> <br> Venturing into "NEO"-realism need not be done so blindly. After all, we must "see" to know - which is the red pill. And 'abierto los ojos' is but the first step in the process of tidying up the 'symbolic order'.</font> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><br> <br> No formal description. Only my series of about 3. Nothing more than "Oh, shit! We can't get the head up!" <sweat profusely, breathe hard> "What do we do now???"<br> <br> Dr. Joe: "Uh..... look up here .... <squirm> THERE YOU GO, Kiddie! <a little effort> Here we are! Sheesh!"<br> <br> That's the formal description of the technique.<br> <br> Maybe I should publish it... The Green Journal takes anything 3 or more as a series, doesn't it?<br> <br> Joe P.<br> <br> </font> <br>
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:42:07 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.