Re: VBAC revisited

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Tue Jul 8 07:40:36 2003


Joe

looks as though Frankenstein's Law applies here.

art

At Tue, 8 Jul 2003, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: >
>In a message dated 7/8/03 06:42:40, rbraun@iupui.edu writes:
>
>> Hence the need to teach our residents how to use forceps correctly.
>> Dan
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Hence the view of many that preventing that primary CS is key.
>>
>> Lynne Loeffler, CNM, JD
>>
>Well, just add THIS news story to the mix.
>
>Joe P.
>
>--
>
>CIMS Alarmed By Highest US Cesarean Rate Ever
>
>PONTE VEDRA, Fla., July 8 /PRNewswire/ -- The Coalition for Improving
>Maternity Services (CIMS) views with alarm the Centers for Disease Control's report
>that the 2002 cesarean rate reached 26.1%, the highest rate ever for the U.S.
>The World Health Organization states that a cesarean rate greater than 10-15%
>cannot be justified.
>
>"One in four women giving birth by major abdominal surgery is difficult to
>defend," said Deborah Woolley, CNM, Ph.D., CIMS' Chairperson. "For example,
>there has been no decline in cerebral palsy or shoulder dystocia associated with
>the rise in this operation. Furthermore, studies show that healthy women, who
>should rarely need operative delivery, undergo a large percentage of the
>cesarean sections performed in the U.S."
>
>According to The Coalition for Improving Maternity Services, the overuse of
>cesarean section poses considerable danger to the health and well-being of
>mothers and babies. Compared with vaginal birth, maternal risks include increased
>risk of death, surgical injury, infection, hemorrhage, deep venous clots, and
>pulmonary embolism. Women are more likely to experience pain and poor health
>after birth, and to require readmission to the hospital. Women having unplanned
>cesareans are more likely to suffer post-partum depression or post-traumatic
>stress syndrome.
>
>Otherwise healthy babies born by cesarean are more likely to need assistance
>with breathing, be admitted to intensive care for breathing problems, and to
>develop persistent pulmonary hypertension, a life threatening complication.
>Mothers are more likely to have difficulty forming an attachment to their infant
>and to breastfeed.
>
>Long-term and reproductive hazards of cesarean section include chronic pelvic
>pain or bowel problems, infertility, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage,
>premature birth, placenta previa (the placenta overlays the cervix), placental
>abruption (the placenta detaches before the birth), and uterine rupture. The risk of
>uterine rupture is 1 in 500 even with planned repeat cesarean versus 1 in
>10,000 with an unscarred uterus.
>
>Besides improving maternal-infant health, reducing the cesarean rate to an
>appropriate level would save the national health care system over $2 billion
>annually.
>
>The rise in cesarean rate is attributable both to the rise in first
>cesareans, now at 18%, also a new high, and the precipitous fall in the percentage of
>vaginal births after cesarean (VBACs). CIMS is especially concerned about the
>ongoing increase in first cesareans because most women having a first cesarean
>will go on to have more despite the fact that elective repeat cesarean section
>is more hazardous for the mother and not any safer for the baby.
>
>Each subsequent cesarean incrementally increases the likelihood of most
>cesarean-related complications, including placenta accreta, (the placenta invades
>the uterus resulting in massive hemorrhage at the delivery). The American
>College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists attributes the 10-fold increase in this
>deadly complication over the last decades to the rise in cesareans.
>
>While uterine rupture is slightly more likely with planned vaginal birth (5
>per 1,000 versus 2 per 1,000 for a repeat cesarean), newborn outcomes do not
>differ. With appropriate care, 7 out of 10 women or more laboring after a
>cesarean will birth vaginally.
>
>The decline in the VBAC rate has come about through obstetricians
>discouraging and outright refusing VBAC, a reversal of policy deplored by CIMS. Denial of
>VBAC forces thousands of women into having major operations they neither want
>nor need.
>
>A free copy of The Risks of Cesarean Delivery to Mother and Baby, a CIMS Fact
>Sheet, is available from http://www.motherfriendly.org.
>
>SOURCE Coalition for Improving Maternity Services
>
>CO: Coalition for Improving Maternity Services
>
>ST: Florida
>
>SU: WOM
>
>Web site: http://www.motherfriendly.org
>
>http://www.prnewswire.com
>
>07/08/2003 00:01 EDT
>

--
art fougner, md
ich bin ein New Yorker




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:44:42 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.