|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Tc99 at 32 wksFrom: Marco A. Pelosi, III, MD (marcop@agoron.com)Mon Oct 21 12:27:24 2002
At Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Lynn D. Montgomery, M.D. wrote: > >Not according to our Radiologists. They actually say the opposite - a >negative VQ would mean potentially reflexing to a CT. They say that in >radiology studies the VQ has significantly greater numbers of false >negatives than the CT. >Lynn > According to Ourrrr radiologists, CT is a great test for main, lobar and segmental emboli, but a poor test for subsegmental emboli. Nonetheless, high clinical suspicion with normal CT or VQ findings warrants additional eval.
-- M.A. Pelosi, III, MD
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:52:29 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.