-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Consent for delivery From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com) Wed Jul 31 09:26:17 2002 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: art fougner, md: "Re: Under The Influence" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: Consent for delivery" In reply to: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Consent for delivery" Next in thread: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Consent for delivery" Reply: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Consent for delivery" major beneficiaries of consent are the attorneys. the big losers are the forests and our environment. the concept of consent should be replaced by a new concept - informed discussion. just my opinion - i could be wrong. art At Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Garry E. Siegel, M.D. wrote: > >When the informed consent law hit Georgia in 1989, we all thought the >same, but our legal friends pretty much said that we were better off >with a consent signed than without one, FWIW. > >Garry > >At Tue, 30 Jul 2002, D. Ashley Hill, MD wrote: >> >>At Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Joe Cutchin wrote: >>> >>>Consent for loabor and delivery? Never heard of it? What are the other options? >> >>I have to agree. How can you require patients to sign a consent form >>for the default "procedure" which is a (presumed) uncomplicated vaginal >>delivery. The only other option is a cesarean, and if you don't offer >>that to patients without an indication there is no reason for a consent. >>It's different when there is an option, such as with a VBAC patient. >>Further, in the future we may offer vaginal or elective cesarean >>delivery depending on patient wishes. In that case a consent is >>indicated because you are comparing two options with unique risks, >>benefits and alternatives. >> >>Ashley >> >>-- >>D. Ashley Hill, MD >>Associate Director >>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology >>Florida Hospital Family Practice Residency >>Orlando, Florida >> >-- >Garry E. Siegel, M.D. >Private Practice >Roswell, GA > -- art fougner, md ich bin ein New Yorker Next message: art fougner, md: "Re: Under The Influence" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: Consent for delivery" In reply to: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Consent for delivery" Next in thread: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Consent for delivery" Reply: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Consent for delivery"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:51:58 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.