Re: Down's Syndrome Screening

From: zygote@icsi.net
Mon Jul 8 07:42:01 2002


Having read the article yesterday, tell me what your concerns are! The studies in progress are going to tell us whether the faster trial or other methods MAY be good to do. The entire summation of the article above suggests that there is no method which is 100% in use; and that most pick up 50-60% of fetal tri-21. They certainly suggest that the 37yr standard is not a good one to bank on.

So given the above, what is the point of your query!

On 5 Jul 2002 at 16:42, RModugno@aol.com wrote:

>
> Before this becomes the "standard of care" in the USA, check this out!
> bmj.com Abstracts: Wellesley et al. 325 (7354): 15
>
> Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG
> Marietta, GA
> http://www.novaobgyn.yourmd.com





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:53:43 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.