Re: Statement on Results of the HERS II Trial on Hormone Replacement Therapy by ACOG

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Thu Jul 4 08:42:31 2002


as the pendulum swings ...

art

At Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Efrain Ramirez wrote: >
>ACOG NEWS RELEASE
>For Release July 2, 2002
>
>Statement on Results of the HERS II Trial on Hormone Replacement Therapy
>By The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
>
>Results of the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study Follow-up
>(HERS II) appear in the July 3, 2002 issue of The Journal of the
>American Medical Association (JAMA).1 This study followed participants
>in the 4.1 year HERS I study 2 for an additional 2.7 years on average.
>
>Both HERS trials looked at the effect of a combination of hormone
>replacement therapy (0.625 mg of conjugated estrogens plus 2.5 mg
>medroxyprogesterone acetate daily) on coronary and non-coronary diseases
>in older, postmenopausal women with pre-existing coronary disease (CHD).
>
>HERS II trial results confirm the initial findings of HERS I: that
>hormones brought no overall reduction in risk of coronary events for
>this population of older women with CHD. Because HERS I showed an
>increased risk of coronary events in the early years of treatment
>followed by a reduced risk in subsequent years, some had hypothesized
>that a cardiovascular benefit would be seen with additional years of
>treatment. However, HERS II indicates that even with additional years
>of observation (for a total of 6.8 years of study on average), hormone
>treatment does not provide a cardiovascular benefit in older women with
>CHD - i.e., secondary prevention of heart disease. Study authors note
>this finding supports the position of the American Heart Association in
>not recommending HRT use in older women with CHD for the purpose of
>preventing coronary events.
>
>Whether HRT helps prevent heart disease in women who don't already have
>the disease (primary prevention) remains an open question. The HERS
>studies did not address whether postmenopausal hormones prevent CHD in
>younger, healthier women. HERS study participants had CHD and were 71
>years of age on average at the start of the HERS II study: the average
>age of US women at menopause, when they are most likely to initiate HRT,
>is 51. Answers on this issue will have to come from other research
>studies.
>
>Part II of the HERS II study examined the effects of hormone therapy on
>non-cardiovascular disease outcomes. Most findings confirmed previous
>observational studies or the results of HERS I. Hormone treatment
>slightly increases the risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary
>embolism. The study's oral hormone treatment also showed a
>statistically significant increased risk of biliary tract (gallbladder
>disease) surgery for this older population.
>
>HERS II found that hip fractures were slightly more common in women on
>HRT, although the authors note this is probably a chance finding. Other
>retrospective studies have shown that HRT can stop declining bone
>density in women who have, or are at risk for, osteoporosis, when given
>within a few years of menopause and continued for some period of time.
>Since few of the women in the HERS study appeared to have osteoporosis,
>it is not surprising that estrogen treatment was not found to reduce
>bone fractures. Use of the study to justify abandoning HRT as a method
>of improving bone health is premature.
>
>Use of hormones did not appear to increase the risks of cancers. The
>6.8 year HERS study did not find a statistically significant increase in
>breast cancer. Some other studies have suggested that if HRT increases
>the risk of breast cancer it comes with long-term use (7 to 10 years or
>more). Since breast cancer is a major concern for many women, the HERS
>results could be reassuring for women considering HRT for short-term
>use.
>
>The combined HERS studies provide important information in our
>understanding of the effects of hormones on older women with CHD.
>Doctors and patients must still await the outcome of additional research
>for HRT effects in younger, healthier postmenopausal women. Finally, as
>the HERS authors point out, the use of HRT for relief of menopausal
>symptoms -- such as hot flashes or vaginal dryness -- continues to be a
>benefit for women in the perimenopause or early menopause years. For
>many women, HRT can provide significant symptom relief.
>
>For these reasons, ACOG continues to recommend that decisions regarding
>a woman's use of HRT when indicated be made between the woman and her
>physician on an individual basis. 3
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>1 Heart and estrogen/progestin replacement study follow-up (HERS II):
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Part 1, Grady D et al, Cardiovascular outcomes during 6.8 years of
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>--
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>hormone therapy. Part II, Hully S et all, Non-cardiovascular outcomes
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>during 6.8 years of hormone therapy.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>2 Hully S et al. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for
>secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women.
>JAMA. 1998; 280: 605-613.
>
>3 ACOG. Guidelines for Women's Health Care (Second Edition, 2002), at
>316.
>
># # #
>
>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) is the
>national medical organization representing over 40,000 physicians who
>provide health care for women.
>
>--
>"Life is neither the notes nor the silence between the notes, but the music that
> arises out of sound and silence felt as a living whole. Stop choosing...between
> chaos and order, and live at the boundary between them, where rest and action
> move together..." David Whyte
>

--
art fougner, md
ich bin ein New Yorker




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:53:43 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.