-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: New guidelines From: Braun, R. Daniel (rbraun@iupui.edu) Thu Jun 20 16:22:58 2002 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Braun, R. Daniel: "Re: WINDOW TIME FRAME FOR PRE-OP ANTIBIOTICS" Previous message: Braun, R. Daniel: "Re: New guidelines" Maybe in reply to: Richard Chudacoff, MD: "New guidelines" Next in thread: Richard Chudacoff, MD: "Cytotec-was RE: New guidelines" Reply: Richard Chudacoff, MD: "Cytotec-was RE: New guidelines" You mean that there are people who don't think that about cytotec. Dan -----Original Message----- From: art fougner, md [mailto:evsono@pipeline.com] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:12 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: New guidelines Rich - i wonder how much lower they could lower the costs of prescription drugs without the army of detail folk, all the dinner meetings, trips, giveaways, etc? as an aside i spoke with Baha Sibai yesterday. he referred to cytotec as the drug of choice for most labor inductions. thought you'd like to know. art At Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Richard Chudacoff, MD wrote: > >Who lobbied them? > >-- >Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG > >-----Original Message----- >From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of Myer >Bornstein >Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:37 PM >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L >Subject: Re: New guidelines > >The AMA ethics committee made the rules > >Myer > >-----Original Message----- >From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Richard >Chudacoff, MD >Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:10 PM >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L >Subject: New guidelines > >As of July 1 drug reps will no longer be able to invite physicians out to >dinner, with spouses, bring lunch into the offices, etc. What bothers me is >that the same people who make the law, our dear representatives, made these >laws over lunch, probably in a far away exotic place. See, they don't want >us bribed, so they are bribed into making laws to keep us honest. Huh? > >Therefore I've decided that as of July first, I will no longer see drug reps >in my office. My time is valuable, and it needs to be paid for just like our >representative's time needs to be paid for. I think if we can get enough >physicians to boycott drug reps perhaps this policy can be changed. > >Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG >Chudacoff Obstetrics & Gynecology, PLLC > >15200 Southwest Freeway, #270 >Sugar Land, TX 77478 >Tel: 281-277-3900 >Fax: 281-277-3901 > >rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com <mailto:rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com> >Richard.Chudacoff@obgyn.net > >http://www.mdhub.com/281-277-3900 >http://www.chudacoffobgyn.yourmd.com >********************************************************************** >Neither the confidentiality nor the integrity of this message >********************************************************************** >can be guaranteed following transmission on the Internet. >********************************************************************** > >********************************************************************** > -- art fougner, md ich bin ein New Yorker Next message: Braun, R. Daniel: "Re: WINDOW TIME FRAME FOR PRE-OP ANTIBIOTICS" Previous message: Braun, R. Daniel: "Re: New guidelines" Maybe in reply to: Richard Chudacoff, MD: "New guidelines" Next in thread: Richard Chudacoff, MD: "Cytotec-was RE: New guidelines" Reply: Richard Chudacoff, MD: "Cytotec-was RE: New guidelines"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:51:44 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.