![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: OB: How to deliverFrom: Braun, R. Daniel (rbraun@iupui.edu)Thu Jan 31 04:40:00 2002
OTOH: Perinatal implications of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1995 Jul;86(1):14-7 (ISSN: 0029-7844) Baskett TF; Allen AC Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Grace Maternity Hospital, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. OBJECTIVE: To assess the antecedents of shoulder dystocia, the risk of recurrence, and the perinatal morbidity associated with the different maneuvers used for its management. METHODS: We conducted a 10-year (1980-1989) retrospective case record review of all instances of shoulder dystocia in a teaching maternity hospital. RESULTS: There were 254 cases of shoulder dystocia in 40,518 vaginal cephalic deliveries (0.6%), with 33 cases (13.0%) of brachial plexus palsy and 13 fractures (5.1%). There were no perinatal deaths attributable to shoulder dystocia. The risk of shoulder dystocia was increased with prolonged pregnancy (threefold), prolonged second stage of labor (threefold), mid-forceps deliveries (tenfold), and increasing birth weight. Of the maneuvers used to deal with shoulder dystocia, strong downward traction on the head was significantly correlated with brachial plexus palsy compared with other individual methods of delivering the shoulders. There was only one case of recurrent shoulder dystocia in 80 women having 93 cephalic vaginal deliveries after their original delivery coded with shoulder dystocia. CONCLUSION: Shoulder dystocia is not a reliably predictable event in labor. Although the risk of shoulder dystocia is increased with prolonged pregnancy, prolonged second stage of labor, increasing birth weight, and mid-forcepts delivery, the majority of cases occur without these risk factors. Strong downward traction on the head is associated with the greatest degree of neonatal trauma, whereas McRoberts maneuver has the least. The risk of recurrent shoulder dystocia is low. To present a contradictory study. Less likely to recur in Halifax than in CHicago. Dan R. Daniel Braun, MD Laws to suppress tend to strengthen what they would prohibit. This is the fine point on which all the legal professions of history have based their job security. Bene Gesserit Coda -----Original Message----- From: evsono@pipeline.com [mailto:evsono@pipeline.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:14 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: OB: How to deliver previous hx of shoulder dystocia carries with it a relative risk of 10 for a repeat performance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001 Jun;184(7):1427-9; discussion 1429-30 How to predict recurrent shoulder dystocia. Ginsberg NA, Moisidis C. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Illinois, USA. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the rate and risk factors for recurrent shoulder dystocia. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with shoulder dystocia was performed by searching a computerized database from January 1, 1993, to June 30, 1999 for the following information: (1) vaginal deliveries, either spontaneous or operative, (2) shoulder dystocia, (3) birth weight, (4) duration of second stage of labor, (5) parity, and (6) gestational diabetes. Statistical analyses included chi(2) and t test. RESULTS: There were 39,681 vaginal deliveries with 602 (1.5%) complicated by shoulder dystocia. Sixty-six patients underwent a subsequent vaginal delivery, and 11 (16.7%) experienced another shoulder dystocia. The odds ratio for a recurrent shoulder dystocia was 10.98 (P <.000001). Nine of the 11 patients with recurrent shoulder dystocia compared with 28 of 55 without a recurrence were nulliparous women in their index pregnancy (P <.001). The mean fetal weights were 3885 g in the recurrent dystocia group and 3702 g in the group without recurrence (P <.03). Gestational age, operative delivery, and gestational diabetes were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Factors that appear to increase the recurrence risk of shoulder dystocia include fetal weight and maternal parity. Prior shoulder dystocia is the single greatest predictive factor. suggest this be presented to the patient before discussing options. art
At Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Garry Siegel wrote:
>
-- art fougner, md ich bin ein New Yorker
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:50:52 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.