-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: ADMINISTRATION PROMOTING ABSTINENCE From: Joanne Bulley, MD (jbulley@cheshire.net) Tue Jul 31 12:38:29 2001 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Charlie Chambers: "Re: ADMINISTRATION PROMOTING ABSTINENCE" Previous message: Luis Sanchez-Ramos, MD: "Re: Betadine" In reply to: Robert J Woolley: "Re: ADMINISTRATION PROMOTING ABSTINENCE" Next in thread: Charlie Chambers: "Re: ADMINISTRATION PROMOTING ABSTINENCE" Reply: Charlie Chambers: "Re: ADMINISTRATION PROMOTING ABSTINENCE" Reply: Robert J Woolley: "Re: ADMINISTRATION PROMOTING ABSTINENCE" Bob I don't see it as only two options - but condoms aren't the most reliable choice for contraception. The longer than one paragraph discussion I have with the patient covers much more. We happen to be in a society that has chosen to have government and insurance involvement with a lot of this stuff. It is my opinion that we need reliable and accessible contraceptive measures available. It is less expensive to ALL of us if we can diminish the number of unintended pregnancies - as well as other consequences of sexual intercourse. I don't think our government should be promoting and abstinence is the only thing you can discuss and get paid for poilcy. We can't force the issue of sexuality under a rug by saying "Don't do it!" Joanne At Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Robert J Woolley wrote: > >On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Joanne Bulley, MD wrote: > >> Is this comparable to Bush promoting ethanol abstinence - and having his >> daughter arrested for false ID and underage drinking? >> >> I DO promote abstinence - from several angles - but there must be access >> without barriers for those having sex. They should not be left with the >> victorian option of - you had sex, now have the baby - preferably by >> disappearing at some unwed mothers home and pretending it never >> happened! Or you had sex - now live with the consequences of GC, >> Chlamydia, HPV, Syphyllis or HIV. >> >Why do you see these as the only two choices they have? Does anything >prevent them from walking into K-Mart and buying a box of condoms? -- Joanne Bulley, MD Keene, NH, USA Next message: Charlie Chambers: "Re: ADMINISTRATION PROMOTING ABSTINENCE" Previous message: Luis Sanchez-Ramos, MD: "Re: Betadine" In reply to: Robert J Woolley: "Re: ADMINISTRATION PROMOTING ABSTINENCE" Next in thread: Charlie Chambers: "Re: ADMINISTRATION PROMOTING ABSTINENCE" Reply: Charlie Chambers: "Re: ADMINISTRATION PROMOTING ABSTINENCE" Reply: Robert J Woolley: "Re: ADMINISTRATION PROMOTING ABSTINENCE"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:49:24 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.