|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: OB: Fun with preeclampsia--very long!From: Robert Woolley (wooll005@tc.umn.edu)Fri Jul 27 22:50:46 2001
> From: cigdem.arkuran@home.com (Cigdem Arkuran) > Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net > Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 20:50:47 -0500 > To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@mail.medispecialty.com> > Subject: Re: OB: Fun with preeclampsia--very long! > > Although I agree both with the induction/delivery of this patient and > the possibility HELLP syndrome without elevated BP or proteinuria, I am > not convinced that this patient had proper work-up or diagnosis. If you're "not convinced" that this patient had preeclampsia, how can you agree with the treatment, which would not be indicated if the patient did not actually have preeclampsia?
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:49:24 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.