![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: 41 yo, Adnexal MassFrom: Marco A. Pelosi, III, MD (marcop@agoron.com)Thu Jul 19 20:55:36 2001
At Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Braun, R. Daniel wrote: > >Was this mass ovarian or tubal? If ovarian, I doubt related to the >endosalpingiosis and just a coincidental finding. Were there papillary >projections in the cystadenoma? If not, I doubt related to the psammoma >bodies. >Why LSO? Why not TAH BSO in a 41 y/o with an epithelial adnexal mass? > Dan, You've opened the old can of worms again. Kick it up a notch & answer this one: Do you think that the prognosis for a real stage I or II ovarian or fallopian malignancy differs with removal of the uterus if you stage everything else?
-- M.A. Pelosi, III, MD
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:49:24 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.