-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from rmodugno@aol.com From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com) Thu Jul 5 17:25:28 2001 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: ainsron@msn.com: "Re: Triple test in surrogate pregnancy" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: A washingtonpost.com article from rmodugno@aol.com" In reply to: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: A washingtonpost.com article from rmodugno@aol.com" Next in thread: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: A washingtonpost.com article from rmodugno@aol.com" why lay this at the feet of the pharmaceutical cos alone? where are the govts, the UN, the WHO, the lotto? perhaps sally struthers can rally the troops with an updated infomercial. i still can't help wondering how this HIV saga would have unfolded had AIDS not first been described in babies? art PS Joe - time to get out the candlesticks. At Thu, 5 Jul 2001, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: > >In a message dated 7/5/01 1:01:44 PM, wooll005@tc.umn.edu writes: > ><< I would venture a guess that no more than 5% (and probably much less than >that) of people with HIV acquired it in some way that they did not know >was risky. I do not believe in shielding people from the natural >consequences of their freely chosen behaviors. >> > >Also, the article quotes AIDS as killing more people than the plague, yada, >yada, yada. That may ultimately be true. However, on a percentage basis, I >don't know that it's true. After all, for some time (maybe up until recent >decades, but for a long time before that), the human population has been >exponentially growing. So the number of people dying with AIDS now pales in >comparison to the large percentage of the entire European population which >was devastated by the Black Death. > >"Ring around the rosey, pocket full of posies, ashes, ashes, we ALL fall >down!" > >Joe P. -- art fougner, md A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote. Next message: ainsron@msn.com: "Re: Triple test in surrogate pregnancy" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: A washingtonpost.com article from rmodugno@aol.com" In reply to: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: A washingtonpost.com article from rmodugno@aol.com" Next in thread: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: A washingtonpost.com article from rmodugno@aol.com"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:49:23 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.