|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FRI Highest Malpractice Award in Michigan HistoryFrom: Joe Cutchin (forcep@shore.intercom.net)Thu May 31 18:50:22 2001
"art fougner, md" wrote: > > to whit i simply suggest - > > Look for > The Union Label. > > art > > At Thu, 31 May 2001, Harrison Sheld wrote: > > > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > >Yes. Well the juries like to send messages with these 8 figure awards. In this > >case, I am not sure if the message they thought they sent is the message we > >received. The message from the award, and all such exorbitant awards is: Only a > >darn fool practices obstetrics these days. What with increasing government > >generated paperwork and their regulations, increasing malpractice insurance > >premiums (here in Nevada the State Insurance Commission just approved increases > >in premiums of 100%, 90% and 35% for the three largest carriers), increasing > >malpractice awards, and decreasing managed care reimbursements, the only > >accoucheurs that will be left are paupers with a terminal disease. > > > >DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: > > > >> In a message dated 5/30/01 6:12:34 PM, marilyncnm@hotmail.com writes: > >> > >> << In what is believed to be the largest medical malpractice verdict in > >> Michigan history, Washtenaw County last week awarded Dawn Goll with $23 > >> million for the "inexplicable" absence of her obstetrician during the birth > >> of her fourth child, who has brain damage due to complications during labor, > >> the Detroit News reports. Goll had arranged for obstetrician Lawrence > >> Schrock to "personally oversee" the birth of the child, Sierra, to help > >> prevent complications that caused her third child to be born with mild brain > >> damage. However, Schrock missed the birth, and Sierra also suffered > >> permanent brain damage. >> > >> > >> Okay... now we need to come up with a tight, concise (is that redundant?) > >> definition of a new medical-malpractice-obstetrical term: "SCHROCKed". I'm > >> just not sure if we should make it "condition of a doctor who gets sued for > >> missing delivery" or "damage to a baby due to lack of birth attendant" or > >> "giving lots of money in a case with genetic damage and blaming it on someone > >> else" or what... Any ideas? > >> > >> Joe P. > > -- > art fougner, md > > A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote. Art: we are already in a union, a union formed by the Federal govt to produce fees which all the carriers support and use along with the stupid coding gimmicks.The next time around,its cash only.
--
Joseph H. Cutchin MD FACOG 4105463125
314 West Carroll Street 4105463128 Fax
Salisbury,Maryland 21801
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:48:35 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.