|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: 66% Induction RateFrom: Paul Prior MD (pprior@clover.net)Tue May 29 20:53:06 2001
On Tue, 29 May 2001 15:56:42 -0500, mark decker <mdecker@nconnect.net> wrote:
>does the list really feel it is perfectly ok to induce at say 66 or 75% or If there is no increase in morbidity or mortality, no increase in c/s rates (and even this one is arguable) and his patients are happy, then the only real problem comes down to medical resources and costs. Note that I'm not stating that there IS no difference in the items above, but I think there is a growing body of evidence, especially with misoprostol, that this may be the case.
-- Paul Prior MD They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little Coshocton, OH temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Solo Practice - Benjamin Franklin, 1759. OB/GYN, FACOG
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:48:35 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.