-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: 66% Induction Rate From: Richard Chudacoff, MD (rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com) Tue May 29 10:06:23 2001 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: DMECNM@aol.com: "Re: accuracy of V/E findings" Previous message: Eberhard Lisse: "Re: 66% Induction Rate" In reply to: Eberhard Lisse: "Re: 66% Induction Rate" I think this guy has too much time on his hands. Not enough things to worry about his own business that he has to start sticking his nose into others business. -- Richard Chudacoff, MD -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of Eberhard Lisse Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 9:59 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: 66% Induction Rate Don In message <200105291247.HAA06117@mail.medispecialty.com>, Dr Don Miller writes : > >i am starting to do more work in an l & d where one lone ob - so far - has > >a 66% induction rate this year - > >i am going to ask for prospective induction reviews > > Unless you are the department chair, your request will probably not be > well-received as the practice and political dynamics at the L&D have > allowed this rate to occur in the first place. It's likely that there > is some unspoken agreement among those that have worked there longer > than you. Exactly. Anyway, what's his concern with someone else's (induction) rates? Patients usually vote with their feet. Though I think that this rate of inductions is enourmous, leading into the question, you have all been waiting for, what car is this guy driving? > IMHO, if you get the dept chair to agree, retrospective (?monthly) > bar charts of all providers' rates distributed every month can do a > lot to lower such rates especially when there is one outlier. I mentioned before, the nationwide "Quality Assurance Program" in Germany. One should not pick out one single variable, but look at the whole picture, if there is one outlier who on the other hand as better outcomes? > Be careful, you may be perceived as a sanctimonius (like a lot of us > on this list) outsider and the docs already there may turn their > sights on someone who doesn't fit into their view of normal (e.g. a > doc who wears black leather jackets, has piercings or wears chrome > jewelery, or rides a Harley!) I learned a new word the other day, "team player". Cool :-)-O el Next message: DMECNM@aol.com: "Re: accuracy of V/E findings" Previous message: Eberhard Lisse: "Re: 66% Induction Rate" In reply to: Eberhard Lisse: "Re: 66% Induction Rate"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:48:35 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.