![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: 66% Induction RateFrom: Eberhard Lisse (el@ac.lisse.na)Tue May 29 09:56:37 2001
Don
In message <200105291247.HAA06117@mail.medispecialty.com>, Dr Don Miller writes
:
> >i am starting to do more work in an l & d where one lone ob - so far - has Exactly. Anyway, what's his concern with someone else's (induction) rates? Patients usually vote with their feet. Though I think that this rate of inductions is enourmous, leading into the question, you have all been waiting for, what car is this guy driving?
> IMHO, if you get the dept chair to agree, retrospective (?monthly) I mentioned before, the nationwide "Quality Assurance Program" in Germany. One should not pick out one single variable, but look at the whole picture, if there is one outlier who on the other hand as better outcomes?
> Be careful, you may be perceived as a sanctimonius (like a lot of us I learned a new word the other day, "team player". Cool :-)-O el
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:50:23 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.