Re: Jury Finds Guilty of Homicide in Stillbirth.

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Mon May 28 11:02:26 2001


Fetal Rights! hmmmm? add fetuses to the list of americans who have more rights than physicians.

just my opinion - i could be wrong.

art

At Mon, 28 May 2001, Efrain Ramirez wrote: >
>Very good points -- the issue on fetus "legal rights" is one of the most
>controversial subjects I can find -- it goes to the very core of "why
>are we here" questions - to find "legal answers" to those questions is
>ludicrous - to find "legal solutions" to the problem is, on the other
>hand, wise. Is that an oxymoron?
>
>We as human beings have evolved, not merely anatomically, but socially
>and morally - what will humans would "think or behave" (individually and
>as a society) in 200 years from now - is anyone's guess - I try, for the
>time been and as best as I can, not to be judgmental - I adhere to the
>thoughts by David Whyte -
>
>At Mon, 28 May 2001, Paul Prior MD wrote:
>>
>>On Mon, 28 May 2001 07:18:16 -0500, Kathi Wilson <wilsonk@gtn.on.ca>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Efrain Ramirez wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A80091-2001May26.html
>>>> Comments?
>>>
>>>Gee, sounds like they've found yet one more way to fill up your jails. What an
>>>elegant solution.
>>>
>>>This decision could not be rendered north of the border. In Canada, the fetus at
>>>any stage has no legal rights under the law, and therefore legal definitions of
>>>murder, manslaughter, abuse etc. do not apply. Similarly, a woman's autonomy is
>>>paramount and she cannot be forced to undergo measures on behalf of the fetus (eg.
>>>Caesarean section).
>>
>>And such ideas, when carried to their logic endpoint, means that since
>>a fetus has "no rights" and a woman's "autonomy is paramount",
>>elective late 3rd term abortion should be fine, right?
>>
>>Don't be fooled into thinking the answer is clear, one way or the
>>other. The abortion debate is not one that needs to be played out
>>here, but these issues as it relates to a mother's indirect care of
>>her unborn child have serious weight in many people's minds. If a
>>baby is a person the minute he or she is born, but yet 10 minutes
>>prior to that time he/she has "NO legal rights", doesn't that strike
>>you as a bit strange?
>>
>>--
>>Paul Prior MD They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
>>Coshocton, OH temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
>>Solo Practice - Benjamin Franklin, 1759.
>>OB/GYN, FACOG
>>
>--
>"Life is neither the notes nor the silence between the notes, but the music that
> arises out of sound and silence felt as a living whole. Stop choosing...between
> chaos and order, and live at the boundary between them, where rest and action
> move together..." David Whyte
>

--
art fougner, md

A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:50:23 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.