|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Failed tubal ligation.From: ainsron@msn.comWed May 23 23:44:56 2001
I agree, the Carter tubal assistant (or is it elevator?) is very useful and practical. > >>Kevin - > >I recommend you find a source for the "Carter Tubal Assistant" device. >It is nothing more than a slightly modified army/navy type retractor, >but the little grove on the back of the bent edge makes it quite easy >to "fish" tubes in those big ladies. > >When I first was introduced to them, I thought "what a waste" but >after growing comfortable with their use, I recommend them highly. >They just make you look real slick when you are doing a tubal on a 120 >lb skinny woman, but they can save the day on a 300 lb challenge. > >They come with a video that demonstrate the technique, which is quite >simple. I actually think the way the surgeon does the tubal on the >video is faulty, but I love the device. > >Just a little pearl.... > >-- >Paul Prior MD They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little >Coshocton, OH temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. >Solo Practice - Benjamin Franklin, 1759. >OB/GYN, FACOG >
-- Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:48:34 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.