Re: Abortion-Cancer Warning Considered

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Tue May 8 21:40:26 2001


once again we redefine the concept of practicing medicine without a license.

art

At Tue, 8 May 2001, Dean Huffman wrote: >
>.
>
>Abortion-cancer warning considered
>
>BOSTON (AP) - Massachusetts is joining other states in considering
>legislation that would require doctors to tell women they may be at greater
>risk for breast cancer if they have an abortion. However, both the American
>Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute have concluded that any
>relationship between abortion and breast cancer is unproven. Anti-abortion
>groups support the bills, which they say are intended to provide women with
>valuable health information, while pro choice advocates say the warning is
>a scare tactic designed to pressure women to abandon abortions.

--
art fougner, md

A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:48:33 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.