-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: coding From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com) Wed Apr 25 10:32:06 2001 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: art fougner, md: "Re: GYN: recurrent abnormal paps" Previous message: William McIntosh: "Re: coding" In reply to: Robert J Woolley: "coding" Next in thread: Myer S. Bornstein, MD, MMM, CPE, FACOG: "Re: coding" Reply: Myer S. Bornstein, MD, MMM, CPE, FACOG: "Re: coding" are there modifiers for practitioner? ie nurse vs doc, primary vs specialist, etc? if not, why not??? art At Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Robert J Woolley wrote: > >Our office is having a minor disagreement about the proper way to code for >routine annual gynecologic exams. For the moment, assume that one is doing >just breast/pelvic exam, perhaps renewing an OC prescription, but no >specific problems addressed otherwise--in other words, just preventive >care. > >Are y'all using E/M codes for this? If so, at what level (typically), and >what diagnostic code? Are any insurers requesting that it be done >differently? > >Our coding specialist insists that these should be coded as preventive >medicine visits (99394-99397, depending only on age), with a -52 modifier >to indicate reduced service (since it's not a complete multisystem >exam). Although I see the technical legitimacy of that theory, it ain't >the way I've been doing it. Do any of you do it that way? -- art fougner, md A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote. Next message: art fougner, md: "Re: GYN: recurrent abnormal paps" Previous message: William McIntosh: "Re: coding" In reply to: Robert J Woolley: "coding" Next in thread: Myer S. Bornstein, MD, MMM, CPE, FACOG: "Re: coding" Reply: Myer S. Bornstein, MD, MMM, CPE, FACOG: "Re: coding"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:41:48 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.