Re: 17 Minute Rule

From: Efrain Ramirez (eramirez@icepr.com)
Sat Apr 21 21:52:26 2001


Legally or medically, there is *nothing* written except outcomes -- if you happen to have a ruptured uterus and delivered a healthy baby in 35 minutes you are ok - if you delivered a dead fetus in 16 minutes you will find *experts* making a Disney line. Don't fool ourselfs -- IMHO ACOG should make a strong statement -as it did on Misoprostol - very well done BTW - addressing that issue.--- "With a little help from my friends"

At Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Dean Huffman wrote: >
>.
>
>Legally, there is no "17 minute rule" that I can find. I have searched all
>the appellate courts, state and federal, and cannot find any mention of
>such rule. If and when an appellate court wishes to issue such a rule, then
>there WILL be a "17 minute rule". At that point, it will make no difference
>whatsoever whether the medical literature accepts such a rule, or not, or
>whetherer such a rule is reasonable, or not. It will be a legal fact of
>life, at least in that jurisdiction, unless it is changed by a higher court
>or by a subsequent case.
>
>Medically, the 17 minute rule is mentioned in the American Journal of
>Obstetrics & Gynecology about five or six years ago. I have a copy of the
>article on file and can provide it for you if you wish.
>
>In sum, there are two sets of rules. One is a legal rule, which, as best I
>can tell, has not yet been established. The other is a medical rule which,
>as best I can determine, has been mentioned only once in a peer reviewed
>journal, about five or six years ago. It may well have been mentioned in
>other journals such as Contemporary OB/GYN.
>
>--
>Dean Huffman
>
>- - - -
>
>Re: 17 Minute Rule
>From: Richard Chudacoff, MD (rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com)
>Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:38:06 -0600
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>There is not '17-minute rule.' There is only with or without perinatal
>
>--
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>morbidity.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--
>Richard Chudacoff, MD
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of Dean
>Huffman
>Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 2:27 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: 17 Minute Rule
>
>.
>
>Regarding the "17 minute rule", I have searched the entire federal and
>state legal database in WestLaw and I can find no mention of the "17 minute
>rule" in any appellate cases. The search was done about two months ago. If
>anybody has a more recent search and has found an appellate reference to
>the 17 minute rule, please let me know.
>
>Dean Huffman, M.D.
>Perinatl@bigfoot.com
>
>- - - -
>
>Re: VBAC, immediate availabilty and change in hospital policy
>From: ainsron@msn.com
>Sun, 11 Feb 2001 19:23:51 -0600 (CST)
>
>Several posts dating back to 1997 regarding this topic, here is the most
>concise one: The "17 minute rule" is mentioned in Bruce Flamm's excellent
>editorial "Once a Cesarean, Always a Controversy" in Aug 97 Green Journal
>(Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:312-5). He states, "A large study (19) on uterine
>rupture found that no infants had significant perinatal morbidity when
>delivered within 17 minutes of the onset of a prolonged deceleration." The
>reference on this large study is Leung et al, Am J Obstet Gynecol
>1993;169:945-50.
>One further note is needed, apparently this study only had seven patients
>and the only one that had problems was outside of the 17 minute cut-off,
>ergo what some have called the 17 minute rule. I doubt you are truly brain
>dead, but if we aren't careful and speedy, apparently our patients might be.
>
>>Must have been brain dead at the time - but what is the 17 minutes about?
>>
>>Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG
>>Marietta, GA
>
>--
>Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>

--
"Life is neither the notes nor the silence between the notes, but the music that
 arises out of sound and silence felt as a living whole. Stop choosing...between
 chaos and order, and live at the boundary between them, where rest and action
  move together..." David Whyte




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:50:05 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.