Re: No Guts Not Glory, was Re: Open Mind, Brains Fell Out (was Re:

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Sat Apr 21 14:39:22 2001


Kathi -

as i opined, we all have to be true to ourselves.

as far as safety of trial of labor after section, some settings just seem too risky. not fact, just opinion.

funny, when i pointed this out to the then President of ACOG when the guidelines were looser, she rolled her eyes.

wonder what changed?

art

At Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Kathi Wilson wrote: >
>"art fougner, md" wrote:
>
>> Ultimately, it's not about language but safety. can one truly justify a
>> trial of scar ( those europeans have a knack for hitting the nail on the
>> head) in a community hospital in wyoming in the middle of a blizzard?
>
>But, Art, how does she get out of the community to have her baby in the middle of the
>blizzard? Are you suggesting that she be evac'd a month prior to her due date to the
>regional centre? Who's going to pay for that -- she and her family?
>
>In Canada, we have had a disastrous experiment w/ flying Innu women out of the far
>north to large centres in the south a month prior to their due dates to deliver.
>Nobody considered the financial and social impact of separating women from their
>families and children for that extended period of time. The results included
>increases in family breakdown and abuse. Women took to concealing their pregnancies
>and lying about their LMP's in order to avoid being evacuated out to the little
>preggo concentration camps they got sent to, and then walking into the nursing
>stations in active labour to give birth.
>
>There consequences to geography which have to be considered. Last year, apparently,
>the only maternal childbearing related death in Manitoba was in a woman who died in a
>car accident in a snow-storm trying to get to the nearest hospital (over an hour
>away) in labour.
>
>I'm not arguing that you shouldn't plan carefully ahead because, of course, you
>should. But if you're going to have a high primary section rate (which many on this
>list seem to argue for) and then say that they have to VBAC in a tertiary care
>centre, there are going to be enormous social and financial costs involved -- and you
>could very possibly lose people en route.
>
>--
>Kathi Wilson, RM
>Ilderton, Ontario, Canada
>mailto:wilsonk@gtn.on.ca
>**********************
>Thames Valley Midwives
>**********************

>346 Platts Lane,
>London, Ontario, Canada
>
>http://tvm.on.ca
>mailto:info@tvm.on.ca
>

--
art fougner, md

A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:48:10 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.