Re: ?? C-Sections to 'Boost Hospital Profits'

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Tue Apr 10 11:37:49 2001


"... The only way to win is not to play."

W.O.P.R re: Tic Tac Toe from "War Games"

art

At Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Braun, R. Daniel wrote: >
> What a crock of ___________. Sure there are a few jerks out there who
>might do a C/S to "make more money", but I think there are so few of them
>that it makes no diference in the long run. And what few are there are doing
>it because of pressure from the OVERSUPPLY of OBGYN's. (Plus CNM's,
>midwives, Nurse practitioners, etc). IOW there are way too many people
>delivering babies compared to what is needed.
>
>Dan
>Like Art, I could be wrong.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Marilyn RingstTo: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Sent: 4/6/2001 4:09 PM
>Subject: ?? C-Sections to 'Boost Hospital Profits'
>
>Physician Refutes Study That Says Doctors Perform C-Sections to 'Boost
>Hospital Profits'
>
> A "leading" Colorado physician has disputed a study reporting
>that "doctors
>feel pressured to perform more Caesarean sections to boost hospital
>profits," calling the conclusion "off-base," the Denver Rocky Mountain
>News
>reports. The study was conducted among 200,000 expectant mothers over
>three
>years by a business professor at the University of Colorado. The study
>indicated that "a hospital's bottom line may determine whether a doctor
>conducts a Caesarean section when wards are full." Naomi Soderstrom, an
>
>associate professor in accounting at University of Colorado at Boulder,
>explained, "From an accounting
>perspective, reducing the number of Caesarean sections may not be in a
>hospital's or physician's best interest since reimbursement rates for
>Caesarean sections are higher than for vaginal births." However, Dr.
>Donald
>Aptekar, president of the Colorado Gynecological and Obstetrical
>Society,
>said, "I want to make it real clear that physicians are not making the
>choice for C-sections because we get paid more money. We don't get paid
>
>more money." He added, "It's counterintuitive to do a C-section if the
>hospital is crowded because the patient will have to stay longer."
>Commenting on the increasing rate of C-sections, Aptekar said that the
>upward trend is "driven by the consumer," as more women are electing to
>undergo the procedure. But Soderstrom maintains that
>the study suggests that "more than medical factors are taken into
>account in
>any physician's decision" (Garner, Denver Rocky Mountain News, 4/5).
>
>Marilyn Ringstaff, CNM
>Marilyn.Ringstaff@obgyn.net

--
art fougner, md

A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:48:10 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.