|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
MRI IN PREGNANCYFrom: Belal Hossain (bhossain@doctor.com)Tue Apr 3 11:57:11 2001
I understand that the renal change is within physiological limit,mere an incidental finding during usg without any c/o.The patient is my next door neighbour, so one thing you must admit,because of easy availability,she or her mates will go on asking me trivial matters instead of the urologist who lives miles apart.After all this is the EBM era.My basic question is on "MRI allowed in pregnancy or not".The idea of doppler study for ureteric flow is very appreciating to me.The suggestion of dilated ovarian veins brings forth the role of laparoscopy in this case.Regarding the idea of termination I 'll write late on.Thank you all for the suggestions. Dr B Hossain MD Kolaghat India -----Original Message----- >Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:58:29 +0100 >From: "Griffiths Malcolm (RC9) Luton & Dunstable Hospital TR" <Malcolm.Griffiths@ldh-tr.anglox.nhs.uk> >To: "'ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net'" <ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net> >Subject: RE: MRI IN PREGNANCY >Message-ID: <ba8f33a8c3db1e59682930332637e3373ac865ab@> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > >Sorry for joining in late. > >This woman is asymptomatic - yes? > >A degree of ureteric dilatation is physiological in pregnancy - is this any >greater in this case? > >Don't understand the relevance of termination of pregnancy. > >If there is a stone can't that be dealt with (if needs be) during pregnancy? > >-----Original Message----- >From: Belal Hossain [mailto:bhossain@doctor.com] >Sent: 30 March 2001 19:16 >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L >Subject: MRI IN PREGNANCY > >Dear Listed Personalities >Here is a case history for your opinion.21.y.o P1001,11w3d ,usg reports mild >hydronephrosis with dilated upper ureter left side,no focal sol or calculi. >Immediately referred to a urosurgeon, repeat usg next day from a senior Sono >reports moderate dilatation of pelvi-calyceal system with a small echogenic >seen in upper third of left ureter;not sure of any calculi.Blood and urine >analysis on Renal profile are WNL(within normal limits).Mom strongly refuses >termination.Urologist didn't comment on cystoscopy,suggests for MRI.I >disagree.Your opinion pl. >Dr B Hossain MD >Group Practice >Kolaghat >India > >______________________________________________ >FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com >______________________________________________ >Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup > >********************************************************************** >>*************************** > ______________________________________________ FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com -- ______________________________________________ Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:50:04 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.