|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Criminal Teaching on immediate cord clamping on an infant's pulsating lifeline, the umbilical cordFrom: Donna Young, Publisher, The Advertiser/Bargain Hunter & More (dyoung@pris.bc.ca)Fri Mar 30 15:09:57 2001
At Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Joanne Bulley wrote: > >As I am sure the rest have figured - this does not appear to be a health >professional. > >I am aswering - sort of - so if she reads it she **may** learn >something... > >The volume of the blood in the baby-placental unit is enough to fill the >blood vessels in both. If the baby gets all the blood filling the >placenta, then the baby has too much blood (too many red blood cells) >and can have significant problems from that. > >At birth, the baby needs only its portion of the blood - not the blood >filling the placenta vessels. > >As indicated by Dr. Cristalli, in addition to having too much blood (as >in the info above), the baby can effectively hemmorrhage into the >placenta and die or have complications from too little blood. > >There is plenty of placental blood (identical to the baby's) so if the >parents decided they must save some blood in one of these banks - then >there is indeed plenty to do it safely. No reason to have any >legislation saying it can't be done... > >Dr. Joanne Bulley > >At Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Donna Young, Publisher, The Advertiser/Bargain >Hunter & More wrote: >> >>This is a copy of correspondence to the Department of Health, State of >>Illinoise >>I am posting this for a response of duty of care of the highest >>standards of medical practice and best practice possible. > >-- >Joanne Bulley, MD, FACOG >Keene, NH, USA >
--
There are over 55 references compiled by experts such as Cory A. Mermer and George Morley, and the references they have complied, I trust would stand up in a court of law. Plus the fact of doing immediate cord clamping.
When we see the facts of how much blood is syringed out in ten minutes and sent to the cord blood banks, and the doctors could not have possibly known how much that was because they have already done immediate cord clamping.
They had no way of knowing that by doing immediate cord clamping, they were saving the child from blood overflow.
Why then are there emergency warnings to a child born in a taxi cab, do not touch the pulsating cord, leave it alone.
How is that child getting full pressure and oxygen not be damaged, but those having the old fashion care of full blood pressure and volume as designed by nature said to be harmed?
This is not an issue to be debated, but for parents to be informed of the logic of nature and science
that there is a purpose that the cord continues to pulsate. . . and the facts that cord blood banks are
getting anywhere from the average of 90 to 200 cc's of the child's blood, and the experts do not question that.
Well, I think a Judge and Jury will, when the public gets more information on what is going
on in secret behind closed doors with obstetric nurses pretending they are not seeing the differences
of practices. Some "ethical" doctors doing full-delayed cord clamping, that is waiting for the placenta
to stop pulsating and be expelled. . no interventions.
And other doctors accepting training and questionable say-so, blood overflow,
like nature did not know what it intended best for the infant to have that man
can come and say he/she knows better. Prove it in a Court of law.
I challenge those out there with pedigrees to their names, whoops, degrees,
to do a video on the fact of immediate cord clamping, before the infant is breathing, that is
now routine, done in C-sections (increased up to 25 percent) and in normal vaginal births.
Then after the immediate cord clamping, the video then shows the Oliver Twist means
of getting the baby started to breathe, the spank on the bottom, the hopeful the
baby breathes. But if not call in the medics to hopefully get the child breathing,
but Oh, Dear, minutes go by. . . we have a survived brain compromised child. I wonder how that happened
Must be bad genes of the parents. Then we see oh, gee we have wasted surplus blood here,
lets send it to our labs. . . we owe it to our fellow man to do research on this infant's surplus
blood. . and then send some to the cord blood banks. Where are they. In most
States, and in Vancouver, BC, Edmonton, Alberta, and in Toronto. Vancouver is privately owned, the
other two are being operated with government funds and by the University in their areas.
Please send your publications, the facts of the research, date, publications,
page book, of any criminal advise for others to follow in the practice of immediate
cord clamping.
I say, if the medical experts are confused of common sense, let them give
a contractual birth plan to the parents, of all available choices: Lotus, no
clamping and/or cutting at all. . . gross by our tidy North American Standards, but
provides the proof that cord clamping and cutting is an man-made intervention, and not
necessary at all. Then full-cord delayed, waiting for the placenta to be expelled.
The immediate cord clamping. .. done before infant is breathing, in many cases,
or shortly after it is born, the quicker the better, to send more volume blood
to the cord blood banks.
Then we have the undecided doctors, what is right or wrong, good or bad medical
practice. They do in-between-cord clamping. They count to 30, as if that is scientific
and really medical knowledge a guess and by golly choice, pretending they have
done something medical . .. of great expertise, then they clamp and cut the child's cord
The benefit, infant has some blood. . . but is weak.
So how many doctors have done immediate cord clamping on their own child?
And videoed the fact of that care to their own. . . and did they deal differently
with the Blackman's child, or the working man's child. . . I* would then call different
methods for different persons. . . Social Darwinism.
I am not writing this to make friends. . . I am sending this that laypersons,
have a write to be heard by private clubs and associations, who call themselves
professionals. . . and block by that fact communication from the rest of the public. A
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:47:51 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.