Re: Criminal Teaching on immediate cord clamping on an infant's
From: Bernard Cristalli (bcrist@club-internet.fr)
Fri Mar 30 13:40:28 2001
We had a case down (?) here where the baby died because of the non clamping
of the cord.
It was a delivery in hot water. The delivery was normal, the cord was not
clamped nor cut and the baby was in his (her?) mother's arms.
The third stage didn't occur immediately and the cord, still in hot water
remained permeable. So it was the baby who 'fed' the placenta and became
anemic to death.
In Mother Nature the cord breaks when the baby falls on the floor and that
causes a spasm which interrupts the umbilical circulation.
--
Bernard Cristalli MD AMACOG
AIHP - ACCA
Paris France
Bernard.Cristalli@CliniquedelEssonne.fr
http://www.CliniquedelEssonne.fr
http://www.obgyn.net/corresp/cristalli.htm
http://www.gyneweb.fr
'64 Mk2 3.8
> De : dyoung@pris.bc.ca (Donna Young, Publisher, The Advertiser/Bargain Hunter
> Objet : Criminal Teaching on immediate cord clamping on an infant's pulsating
> lifeline, the umbilical cord
>
> This is a copy of correspondence to the Department of Health, State of
> Illinoise
> I am posting this for a response of duty of care of the highest
> standards of medical practice and best practice possible. I therefore
> wonder why gynecologists are doing on Boards of Cord Blood Bank and have
> not given guideliens that protect the infant from what I call criminal
> assault on the infant by depriving the infant of full volume pressure
> and full volume of blood. That is all provided by the design and
> purpose of nature to give to the infant, at the time of its birth. The
> placenta continues to serve the infant for perhaps ten minutes,
> transfusing blood into the infant. DNA testing will confirm the cells
> of the blood and ownership of organ and blood, to be the infant's. So
> no medical person can legally deprive the infant of its legal rights to
> all what nature intended the owner to have. Please write me of any
> factual experiments, with parents awareness of consent, of facts that
> would stand up in a Court of Law, that immediate cord clamping is good
> medical practice, and how it serves an infant. To my knowledge, it is a
> practice that should NOT be routine, in c-sections and/or in vaginal
> deliveries. It is a practice only for last hope to save an infant's
> life. I see no logic in taking a infant off its lifeline, that is
> pulsating giving oxygenated blood and fluids to the infant. . . and
> rushing the infant to a machine that has not been wheeled to the
> distressed infant, and added to the treatment, all the while, the infant
> is receiving something of a benefit from its own pulsating lifeline.
>
> From: Donna Young, Box 504, Dawson Creek, BC V1G 4H4 tel/fax:250-782-9223
> email: dyoung@pris.bc.ca
>
>> To Whom it May Concern,
> Department of Health, Illinois
>
> Subject: Unlicensed Midwife charge with a death of a still born? Yvonne
> Cyrn
>
>>
>> You are invited to share some of my correspondence. I am age 59
> years,
>> I live in Northern British Columbia. My world comes to me on my
> computer.
>> . . I have a heart of interest for children. . . I do not like to see even
>> one harmed. . . not even my own, not others. . . Children are our future.
> . .
>> . We, being human, do make errors. When they have been pointed out. . .
>> those errors must be corrected, quickly. . . if the powers are within our
>> means.
> You are the State, you can act quickly. You can lead, where
>> Canada is lacking. . . you can put in a Moratorium. .on immediate cord
>> clamping that can wrongfully deprive the infant of its ownership of up to
> and over 50 percent of its valuable cord blood. That is being asked to
> be
> sent to cord blood banks, operating in almost every State, taking less
> then
> 36 hours to airmail the infant's blood to them. No questions are being
> asked as to the medical operation resulting in the lost and deprived
> blood
> to the infant. Your citizens are being made weaker for that practice,
> with
> no questions asked.
> Ask me for my research, all by the efforts of others. . . who did
> not take their concerns to the Health Departments. . .as I have.
> There are over 55 pages of medical expert opinion that immediate cord
> clamping on the infant's pulsating umbilical cord is not healthy for the
> infant.
>
> Common sense should tell us that to start up a car without oil and gas
> in it, is not good practice. Same thing to start up the engine of a
> newborn
> infant without the blood and fluid lubrication to its heart, lungs,
> brain.
> No blood, and oxygen . . . you can assume dry spots, and some kind of
> damage, that may not be evident for days, weeks, years. . . but the
> infant
> is compromised. The costs of education go up and the costs of medical
> care
> go up. All unnecessary so. . . for a very unnecessary and unsound
> medical
> practice. . that must be immediately investigated, and who all is
> sending
> the infant cord blood to cord stem cell bloods. What insurance
> companies
> are paying for the collecting of the blood. . . secretly coded. . . as
> so-called approved medical procedures? Question the codes, check it out.
>
