Re: Depo provera and lactation -- REPLY

From: Dean Huffman (jth@springnet1.com)
Thu Mar 29 19:39:50 2001


..

Actually, the URL is not of all that much significance. If one has access to the ACOG web site, then just log on, go to the area were documents can be downloaded, check Technical Bulletins only, then search on 258. If one does not have access to all of the ACOG site, then the URL is worthless anyway since access will be denied.

The relavent part of the document states:

Progestin-Only Contraceptives

Progestin-only contraceptives, including progestin-only tablets (minipills), depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), and levonorgestrel implants, do not affect the quality of breast milk and may slightly increase the volume of milk and duration of breastfeeding compared with nonhormonal methods (28-32). Accordingly, progestin-only methods are the hormonal contraceptives of choice for breastfeeding women. Nonetheless, some authorities have recommended delays of various lengths before introduction of progestin-only contraceptives on the basis of two sets of theoretical concerns:

- The normal 2-3-day postdelivery decrease of progesterone is part of the process that initiates lactation. There is theoretical concern that giving progestins in the first few days before lactation is established could interfere with optimal lactation. Note that DMPA enters the milk at approximately the same level found in the woman's blood; by contrast norgestrel and norethindrone enter the milk at only one tenth the level in the woman's blood. The injectable route of administration also may result in a comparatively high initial dose (27).

- Progestin methods carry a theoretical risk to the newborn because of exposure to exogenous steroids at a time when the newborn's system is very immature in its ability to metabolize drugs. Because of this concern, research studies presented to the FDA for drug approval investigated only the effects of these methods administered several weeks after birth. Because documentation of experience with earlier initiation was not presented to the FDA, package inserts recommend initiation of progestin-only oral contraceptives at 6 weeks for women who are exclusively breastfeeding and at 3 weeks for those who are breastfeeding with supplementation. Most authorities recommend introduction of long-acting progestin-only injectables or implants 6 weeks after delivery for breastfeeding women (27, 33, 34).

To balance these conservative recommendations, it is important to understand that the few studies that included early administration of progestin-only methods-oral contraceptives at 1 week postpartum (35, 36) and injectable medroxyprogesterone acetate at 2 days (37) and 7 days (38)-found no adverse effects on the newborn or on breastfeeding. In the absence of evidence that earlier introduction of progestin-only contraceptives has adverse effects on the newborn and on breastfeeding, the labeling for progestin-only oral contraceptives focuses instead on what is known about fertility after childbirth. Taking only biologic factors into account, contraception is not needed in the first 3 weeks postpartum because of a delay in return of ovulation in all women. And this delay is extended for women who breastfeed exclusively. An implied prohibition on earlier administration is more in the nature of a pragmatic rather than a scientific resolution of the question. From the perspective of routine clinical practice, it would appear reasonable to apply the same rationale, even though conservative, to the initiation of DMPA and implants in postpartum breastfeeding women. However, the package labeling for these methods has the effect of being even more conservative as noted, outlining a 6-week start for all breastfeeding women, with no flexibility. Sometimes, however, there are practical reasons a breastfeeding woman may consider initiating hormonal contraception while in the hospital or shortly after. For example, there may be uncertainty about opportunities for follow-up visits. The breastfeeding woman and her physician can then weigh the reasons for early use of these contraceptives against potential disadvantages, make an appropriate decision, and continue to evaluate the woman's individual breastfeeding experience if hormonal contraceptives are chosen.

--

27.Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, Cates W Jr, Stewart GK, Guest F, et al. Contraceptive technology. 17th rev. ed. New York: Ardent Media, Inc, 1998

28.Tankeyoon M, Dusitsin N, Chalapati S, Koetsawang S, Saibiang S, Sas M, et al. Effects of hormonal contraceptives on milk volume and infant growth. WHO Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Task Force on Oral Contraceptives. Contraception 1984;30:505-522

29.World Health Organization (WHO) Task Force on Oral Contraceptives. Effects of hormonal contraceptives on milk composition and infant growth. Stud Fam Plann 1988;19:361-369

30.Speroff L, Darney P. A clinical guide for contraception. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Maryland: Williams & Wilkins, 1996

31.Abdulla KA, Elwan SI, Salem HS, Shaaban MM. Effect of early postpartum use of the contraceptive implants, NORPLANT, on the serum levels of immunoglobulins of the mothers and their breastfed infants. Contraception 985; 32:261-266

32.Shaaban MM, Salem HT, Abdullah KA. Influence of levonorgestrel contraceptive implants, NORPLANT, initiated early postpartum upon lactation and infant growth. Contraception 1985;32:623-635

33.World Health Organization. Division of Family and Reproductive Health. Improving access to quality care in family planning: medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. Geneva: WHO, 1996

34.Physicians' Desk Reference. 53rd ed. Montvale, New Jersey: Medical Economics, Inc, 1999

35.McCann MF, Moggia AV, Higgins JE, Potts M, Becker C. The effects of a progestin-only oral contraceptive (levonorgestrel 0.03 mg) on breast-feeding. Contraception 1989;40:635-648

36.Moggia AV, Harris GS, Dunson TR, Diaz R, Moggia MS, Ferrer MA, et al. A comparative study of a progestin-only oral contraceptive versus non-hormonal methods in lactating women in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Contraception 1991;44:31-43

37.Guiloff E, Ibarra-Polo A, Zañartu J, Toscanini C, Mischler TW, Gómez-Rogers C. Effect of contraception on lactation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974;118:42-45

38.Karim M, Ammar R, el Mahgoub S, el Ganzoury B, Fikri F, Abdou I. Injected progestogen and lactation. BMJ 1971;1:200-203

- - - -

Re: Depo provera and lactation

From: Griffiths Malcolm (Malcolm.Griffiths@ldh-tr.anglox.nhs.uk) Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:03:20 -0600

I still think this is unwieldly!

-----Original Message----- From: bruce.speyer@medispecialty.com [mailto:bruce.speyer@medispecialty.com] Sent: 29 March 2001 17:05 To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Depo provera and lactation

Hi, much simplified URL that pulls up the same document:

http://www.acog.com/search97cgi/s97_cgi.exe?action=View&VdkVgwKey=http://www .acog.com/publications/educational%5Fbulletins/btb258.htm&DocOffset=1&Collec tion=5&ViewTemplate¬ogview.hts

-Bruce

At Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Dean Huffman wrote: > > > > >From: Jim Cahill (objim73@yahoo.com) > >Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:40:15 -0600 (CST) > >Subject: Depo provera and lactation > > > >I have been in the habit of offering depo-provera for contraception to > >patients while they were still hospitalized following delivery. My > >lactation consultant has informed me that lactation can be impeded by using > >depo-provera immediately after delivery and that it is wiser to wait > >several weeks before providing the initial dose. I cannot find reference to > >this. Any ideas about this issue? > > > >James D. Cahill MD > > > >See ACOG Technical Bulletin number 258, July, 2000, "Breastfeeding: >Maternal and Infant Aspects". If you cannot get access to it, check with me >privately. > >Log on to <http://www.acog.com>, go to the search page and select Technical >Bulletins (only) and search on breastfeeding. The URL is somewhat unweildy, >but here it is: > >http://www.acog.com/search97cgi/s97_cgi.exe?action=View&VdkVgwKey=http%3A%2 F%2Fwww%2Eacog%2Ecom%2Fpublications%2Feducational%5Fbulletins%2Fbtb258%2Ehtm &DocOffset=1&DocsDocOffset=1&DocsFound&QueryZip%8%0D%0A&Collection=5&SearchU rl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eacog%2Ecom%2Fsearch97cgi%2Fs97%5Fcgi%2Eexe%3Faction%3D Search%26QueryZip%3D258%250D%250A%26ResultTemplate%3Dacogrslt%252Ehts%26Quer yText%3D258%250D%250A%26Collection%3D5%26ResultStart%3D1%26ResultCount%3D10& ViewTemplate¬ogview%2Ehts&ServerKey=&AdminImagePath=&Theme=&Compan > >-- >Dean Huffman >pperinatl@bigfoot.com >

--
Bruce Speyer, CTO Home of OTOHNS.net http://www.otohns.net
MediSpecialty.com A Physician Directed Network
+001 512-835-1111 ext 227 and OBGYN.net http://www.obgyn.net
512-835-6112 fax, 512-632-3455 cell The Universe of Women's Health
EMAIL: bruce.speyer@medispecialty.com




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:47:51 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.