Re: Of Interest And Importance To Obstetricians ...

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Fri Mar 23 06:22:05 2001


ditto that, Joe they'll never take me alive! LOL

art

At Thu, 22 Mar 2001, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: >
>In a message dated 3/22/01 9:18:44 PM, pprior@clover.net writes:
>
><< >> I don't think legally there is a problem with doing drug screens on
>urine
>>>
>>I think there is now that we have this new ruling from the Supreme Court.
>>You cannot do it without patient consent.
>
>The case dealt with passing that information to POLICE. I don't think
>they ruled on the testing as a fundamental issue. >>
>
>Correct. They were concerned about testing without consent and then giving
>the cops the results. There is NO implication that I can see about testing
>for medical purposes. The scenario of the obtunded gravida being tested for
>drugs to indicate whether she needs to be treated for an overdose is SO far
>from the Supreme Court's ruling that I would consider it malpractice if
>someone did NOT test an unconscious patient for drugs in that situation.
>
>Joe P.

--
art fougner, md

A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:49:49 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.